Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
82
ONEQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.09
Seasonality move
:
4.1%
Day range:
$50.09 - $50.09
52-week range:
$37.50 - $50.34
Dividend yield:
1.01%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
308
1-year change:
11.47%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEP.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
$50.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.01% | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
$37.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.76% | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
$57.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.9% | -- |
|
FGEP.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series
|
$12.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
$18.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 7.21% | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.868 | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | 0.943 | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | 0.951 | -- | -- |
|
FGEP.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.732 | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | 0.521 | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEP.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ.TO or DRFG.TO?
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF, analysts believe CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is more attractive than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ.TO or DRFG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.17%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ.TO or DRFG.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ.TO or ETHI.TO?
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ.TO or ETHI.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF, analysts believe CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is more attractive than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ.TO or ETHI.TO More Risky?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.436%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ.TO or ETHI.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ.TO or ETHI.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ.TO or FGEP.TO?
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- FGEP.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ.TO or FGEP.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series, analysts believe CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 FGEP.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ.TO or FGEP.TO More Risky?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ.TO or FGEP.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ.TO or FGEP.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -- FGEP.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ.TO or GDPY.TO?
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ.TO or GDPY.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF, analysts believe CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is more attractive than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ.TO or GDPY.TO More Risky?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.942%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ.TO or GDPY.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF offers a yield of 7.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ.TO or GDPY.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -- GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ.TO or QEF.NO?
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has higher upside potential than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF, analysts believe CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is more attractive than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ.TO or QEF.NO More Risky?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF is -- versus -- for AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
