Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Buy
86
MEQT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.36
Seasonality move
:
7.25%
Day range:
$30.36 - $30.44
52-week range:
$22.28 - $30.60
Dividend yield:
1.59%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
973
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
18.53%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
|
$30.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.59% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.7% | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
$38.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.74% | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
$57.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.9% | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
$50.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.01% | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.856 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | 0.943 | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | 0.951 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.868 | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is MEQT.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MEQT.TO or DRFG.TO?
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MEQT.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is more attractive than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF0 0 0 DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF0 0 0 -
Is MEQT.TO or DRFG.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.17%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MEQT.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MEQT.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MEQT.TO or ETHI.TO?
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MEQT.TO or ETHI.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF0 0 0 ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is MEQT.TO or ETHI.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.436%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MEQT.TO or ETHI.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MEQT.TO or ETHI.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ETHI.TOGlobal X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF0 0 0 ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.101%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is more attractive than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF0 0 0 QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF0 0 0 -
Is MEQT.TO or QEF.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MEQT.TOMackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Buy
60
ZBIO alert for Dec 23
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
Buy
54
UNF alert for Dec 23
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.
