Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
47
GIQU.B.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.16
Seasonality move
:
3.4%
Day range:
$40.40 - $40.40
52-week range:
$27.73 - $42.48
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
64
1-year change:
13.93%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
$40.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0% | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
$29.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.39% | -- |
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
$69.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
|
$82.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.26% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | 1.548 | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | 1.121 | -- | -- |
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | 1.350 | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.472 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQU.B.TO or CMOM.TO?
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQU.B.TO or CMOM.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged, analysts believe Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is more attractive than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is GIQU.B.TO or CMOM.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQU.B.TO or CMOM.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQU.B.TO or CMOM.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQU.B.TO or DXU.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQU.B.TO or DXU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is more attractive than Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQU.B.TO or DXU.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.872%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQU.B.TO or DXU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQU.B.TO or DXU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQU.B.TO or RLST.NO?
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQU.B.TO or RLST.NO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is more attractive than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQU.B.TO or RLST.NO More Risky?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQU.B.TO or RLST.NO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQU.B.TO or RLST.NO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GIQU.B.TO or XQQU.TO?
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net margin of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of -- beat iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- XQQU.TOiShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GIQU.B.TO or XQQU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has higher upside potential than iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF, analysts believe Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is more attractive than iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 XQQU.TOiShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GIQU.B.TO or XQQU.TO More Risky?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.661% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIQU.B.TO or XQQU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIQU.B.TO or XQQU.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of -- is lower than iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged is -- versus -- for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -- XQQU.TOiShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 2
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is up 8.39% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 2
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is down 2.45% over the past day.
Sell
50
NUTX alert for Jan 2
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 9.22% over the past day.
