Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
58
DXU.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$69.78
Seasonality move
:
5.61%
Day range:
$70.50 - $70.50
52-week range:
$50.50 - $73.53
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
42
Avg. volume:
508
1-year change:
9.22%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLU.NO
iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
$69.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CLU.NO
iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
$29.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.39% | -- |
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
$40.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0% | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | 1.350 | -- | -- |
|
CLU.NO
iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | 1.121 | -- | -- |
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | 1.548 | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DXU.TO
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLU.NO
iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMOM.TO
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQU.B.TO
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RLST.NO
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns DXU.TO or CLU.NO?
iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm has a net margin of -- compared to Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- CLU.NOiShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DXU.TO or CLU.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm, analysts believe Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is more attractive than iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF0 0 0 CLU.NOiShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm0 0 0 -
Is DXU.TO or CLU.NO More Risky?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DXU.TO or CLU.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DXU.TO or CLU.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm quarterly revenues of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm's net income of --. Notably, Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- CLU.NOiShares US Fundamental ETF (CAD-H) Comm-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DXU.TO or CMOM.TO?
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DXU.TO or CMOM.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged, analysts believe Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is more attractive than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF0 0 0 CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is DXU.TO or CMOM.TO More Risky?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DXU.TO or CMOM.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DXU.TO or CMOM.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- CMOM.TOCI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DXU.TO or GIQU.B.TO?
Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a net margin of -- compared to Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DXU.TO or GIQU.B.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged, analysts believe Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is more attractive than Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF0 0 0 GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 -
Is DXU.TO or GIQU.B.TO More Risky?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DXU.TO or GIQU.B.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DXU.TO or GIQU.B.TO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of --. Notably, Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- GIQU.B.TOGuardian i3 US Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DXU.TO or RLST.NO?
RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DXU.TO or RLST.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF, analysts believe Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is more attractive than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF0 0 0 RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF0 0 0 -
Is DXU.TO or RLST.NO More Risky?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DXU.TO or RLST.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DXU.TO or RLST.NO?
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for RBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DXU.TODynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- RLST.NORBC Life Science & Technology Fd ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 2
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is up 7.96% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 2
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is down 2.39% over the past day.
Sell
50
NUTX alert for Jan 2
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 9.08% over the past day.
