GFL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cargojet, Inc. has a net margin of 6.38% compared to GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net margin of 4%. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.41% beat Cargojet, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.88%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Cargojet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.82%. Given that Cargojet, Inc. has higher upside potential than GFL Environmental, Inc., analysts believe Cargojet, Inc. is more attractive than GFL Environmental, Inc..

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cargojet, Inc. has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29699999999999%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Cargojet, Inc. offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Cargojet, Inc. pays out 19.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Cargojet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $219.9M. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $108.1M is higher than Cargojet, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, GFL Environmental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Cargojet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental, Inc. is 3.31x versus 1.36x for Cargojet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. has a net margin of 6.38% compared to GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net margin of 25.05%. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.41% beat Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s return on equity of 9%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $122.35 which suggests that it could grow by 19.45%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd..

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.025%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. pays out 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $108.1M is lower than Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s net income of $917M. Notably, GFL Environmental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s PE ratio is 20.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental, Inc. is 3.31x versus 5.69x for Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mullen Group Ltd. has a net margin of 6.38% compared to GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.41% beat Mullen Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.37%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand Mullen Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $17.10 which suggests that it could grow by 6.74%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mullen Group Ltd., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than Mullen Group Ltd..

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mullen Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.291%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Mullen Group Ltd. offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Mullen Group Ltd. pays out 60.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Mullen Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $561.7M. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $108.1M is higher than Mullen Group Ltd.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, GFL Environmental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Mullen Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental, Inc. is 3.31x versus 0.71x for Mullen Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TFI International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.38% compared to GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net margin of 4.3%. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.41% beat TFI International, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 24.22%. On the other hand TFI International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.83 which suggests that it could fall by -2.5%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than TFI International, Inc., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than TFI International, Inc..

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.196% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TFI International, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.912%.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. TFI International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. TFI International, Inc. pays out 33.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than TFI International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $108.1M is lower than TFI International, Inc.'s net income of $116.6M. Notably, GFL Environmental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while TFI International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental, Inc. is 3.31x versus 1.08x for TFI International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.