Financhill
Buy
62

EMA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$66.85
Seasonality move :
-0.59%
Day range:
$66.51 - $67.23
52-week range:
$51.23 - $69.62
Dividend yield:
4.35%
P/E ratio:
18.11x
P/S ratio:
2.47x
P/B ratio:
1.67x
Volume:
687.4K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
24.65%
Market cap:
$20.2B
Revenue:
$7B
EPS (TTM):
$3.69

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EMA.TO
Emera, Inc.
$2B $0.86 -3.29% 19.23% $69.21
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
$928.7M $0.39 2.09% 32.67% $42.57
FTS.TO
Fortis, Inc.
$3.1B $0.85 21.72% 6.51% $73.77
H.TO
Hydro One Ltd.
$2.3B $0.66 1.66% 0.88% $52.14
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EMA.TO
Emera, Inc.
$66.85 $69.21 $20.2B 18.11x $0.73 4.35% 2.47x
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables, Inc.
$0.0400 -- $416.5K -- $0.00 0% 0.20x
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
$42.28 $42.57 $11.5B 21.52x $0.46 4.33% 3.11x
FTS.TO
Fortis, Inc.
$70.88 $73.77 $35.8B 21.06x $0.64 3.51% 2.95x
H.TO
Hydro One Ltd.
$53.62 $52.14 $32.2B 24.66x $0.33 2.45% 3.63x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EMA.TO
Emera, Inc.
60.52% -0.053 95.99% 0.25x
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables, Inc.
-- 0.000 -- --
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
63.45% -0.092 97.55% 1.32x
FTS.TO
Fortis, Inc.
58.72% 0.269 87.47% 0.38x
H.TO
Hydro One Ltd.
59.85% -0.305 62.93% 0.35x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EMA.TO
Emera, Inc.
$605M $481M 3.55% 8.89% 23.01% -$55M
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables, Inc.
-- -- -- -- -- --
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
$283M $301M 3.36% 8.69% 38.01% -$53M
FTS.TO
Fortis, Inc.
$871M $871M 3.25% 7.51% 29.65% -$426M
H.TO
Hydro One Ltd.
$651M $651M 4.35% 10.64% 28.32% -$70M

Emera, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or BKS.CX?

    Berkley Renewables, Inc. has a net margin of 11.87% compared to Emera, Inc.'s net margin of --. Emera, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.89% beat Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    28.95% $0.76 $34.1B
    BKS.CX
    Berkley Renewables, Inc.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or BKS.CX?

    Emera, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Berkley Renewables, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emera, Inc. has higher upside potential than Berkley Renewables, Inc., analysts believe Emera, Inc. is more attractive than Berkley Renewables, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    3 7 1
    BKS.CX
    Berkley Renewables, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is EMA.TO or BKS.CX More Risky?

    Emera, Inc. has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkley Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or BKS.CX?

    Emera, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Berkley Renewables, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emera, Inc. pays 168.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Berkley Renewables, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or BKS.CX?

    Emera, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Berkley Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Emera, Inc.'s net income of $248M is higher than Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Emera, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.11x while Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera, Inc. is 2.47x versus 0.20x for Berkley Renewables, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    2.47x 18.11x $2.1B $248M
    BKS.CX
    Berkley Renewables, Inc.
    0.20x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or CU.TO?

    Canadian Utilities Ltd. has a net margin of 11.87% compared to Emera, Inc.'s net margin of 12.88%. Emera, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.89% beat Canadian Utilities Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    28.95% $0.76 $34.1B
    CU.TO
    Canadian Utilities Ltd.
    35.73% $0.29 $19.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or CU.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Canadian Utilities Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $42.57 which suggests that it could grow by 0.69%. Given that Emera, Inc. has higher upside potential than Canadian Utilities Ltd., analysts believe Emera, Inc. is more attractive than Canadian Utilities Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    3 7 1
    CU.TO
    Canadian Utilities Ltd.
    1 6 0
  • Is EMA.TO or CU.TO More Risky?

    Emera, Inc. has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Utilities Ltd. has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.37%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or CU.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Canadian Utilities Ltd. offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Emera, Inc. pays 168.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Utilities Ltd. pays out 122.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or CU.TO?

    Emera, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Canadian Utilities Ltd. quarterly revenues of $792M. Emera, Inc.'s net income of $248M is higher than Canadian Utilities Ltd.'s net income of $102M. Notably, Emera, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.11x while Canadian Utilities Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera, Inc. is 2.47x versus 3.11x for Canadian Utilities Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    2.47x 18.11x $2.1B $248M
    CU.TO
    Canadian Utilities Ltd.
    3.11x 21.52x $792M $102M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or FTS.TO?

    Fortis, Inc. has a net margin of 11.87% compared to Emera, Inc.'s net margin of 16.13%. Emera, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.89% beat Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    28.95% $0.76 $34.1B
    FTS.TO
    Fortis, Inc.
    29.65% $0.81 $60.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or FTS.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Fortis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $73.77 which suggests that it could grow by 4.07%. Given that Fortis, Inc. has higher upside potential than Emera, Inc., analysts believe Fortis, Inc. is more attractive than Emera, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    3 7 1
    FTS.TO
    Fortis, Inc.
    4 6 2
  • Is EMA.TO or FTS.TO More Risky?

    Emera, Inc. has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.957%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or FTS.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Fortis, Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Emera, Inc. pays 168.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc. pays out 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Emera, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or FTS.TO?

    Emera, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Emera, Inc.'s net income of $248M is lower than Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $474M. Notably, Emera, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.11x while Fortis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera, Inc. is 2.47x versus 2.95x for Fortis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    2.47x 18.11x $2.1B $248M
    FTS.TO
    Fortis, Inc.
    2.95x 21.06x $2.9B $474M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or H.TO?

    Hydro One Ltd. has a net margin of 11.87% compared to Emera, Inc.'s net margin of 18.49%. Emera, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.89% beat Hydro One Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    28.95% $0.76 $34.1B
    H.TO
    Hydro One Ltd.
    28.32% $0.70 $31.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or H.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.54%. On the other hand Hydro One Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.14 which suggests that it could fall by -2.76%. Given that Emera, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydro One Ltd., analysts believe Emera, Inc. is more attractive than Hydro One Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    3 7 1
    H.TO
    Hydro One Ltd.
    0 10 1
  • Is EMA.TO or H.TO More Risky?

    Emera, Inc. has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydro One Ltd. has a beta of 0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.56%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or H.TO?

    Emera, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Hydro One Ltd. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Emera, Inc. pays 168.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydro One Ltd. pays out 64.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydro One Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Emera, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or H.TO?

    Emera, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Hydro One Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Emera, Inc.'s net income of $248M is lower than Hydro One Ltd.'s net income of $425M. Notably, Emera, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.11x while Hydro One Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera, Inc. is 2.47x versus 3.63x for Hydro One Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMA.TO
    Emera, Inc.
    2.47x 18.11x $2.1B $248M
    H.TO
    Hydro One Ltd.
    3.63x 24.66x $2.3B $425M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
35
SMX alert for Dec 19

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 24.85% over the past day.

Sell
36
INSP alert for Dec 19

Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is down 19.66% over the past day.

Sell
40
INSM alert for Dec 19

Insmed, Inc. [INSM] is down 16.08% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock