Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
56
EMA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.53
Seasonality move
:
-0.54%
Day range:
$53.31 - $53.75
52-week range:
$44.13 - $56.20
Dividend yield:
5.39%
P/E ratio:
23.96x
P/S ratio:
2.06x
P/B ratio:
1.42x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
5.05%
Market cap:
$15.6B
Revenue:
$7.6B
EPS (TTM):
$2.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMA.TO
Emera
|
$2B | $0.78 | 2.21% | -25.08% | $56.15 |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$711.6M | $0.75 | -17.91% | 3.53% | $65.45 |
|
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities
|
$1B | $0.72 | 6.22% | 18.03% | $37.92 |
|
H.TO
Hydro One
|
$2.1B | $0.31 | 4.1% | 3.33% | $44.25 |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$421.8M | $0.08 | -8.73% | -84.58% | $18.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMA.TO
Emera
|
$53.43 | $56.15 | $15.6B | 23.96x | $0.73 | 5.39% | 2.06x |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
$0.0400 | -- | $416.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$62.05 | $65.45 | $8.1B | 15.02x | $0.65 | 4.08% | 2.06x |
|
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities
|
$34.63 | $37.92 | $9.4B | 22.20x | $0.45 | 5.23% | 2.51x |
|
H.TO
Hydro One
|
$44.20 | $44.25 | $26.5B | 23.26x | $0.31 | 2.8% | 3.18x |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$19.54 | $18.38 | $5.8B | 54.28x | $0.06 | 1.23% | 2.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMA.TO
Emera
|
60.04% | 0.809 | 109.56% | 0.30x |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | 0.357 | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
56.92% | 1.076 | 78.08% | 0.61x |
|
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities
|
61.16% | 0.956 | 93.92% | 1.34x |
|
H.TO
Hydro One
|
58.35% | 0.662 | 60.05% | 0.52x |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
69.67% | -0.466 | 79.94% | 0.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMA.TO
Emera
|
$840M | $437M | 2.21% | 5.72% | 14.43% | -$117M |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$574M | $294M | 6.8% | 15.57% | 28.74% | $5M |
|
CU.TO
Canadian Utilities
|
$575M | $103M | 2.83% | 7.03% | 17.78% | $10M |
|
H.TO
Hydro One
|
$851M | $624M | 4.04% | 9.54% | 26.83% | -$103M |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$384M | $99M | 3.41% | 10.36% | 11.6% | $152M |
Emera vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or BKS.CX?
Berkley Renewables has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of --. Emera's return on equity of 5.72% beat Berkley Renewables's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMA.TOEmera46.62% $0.01 $31.1B BKS.CXBerkley Renewables-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or BKS.CX?
Emera has a consensus price target of $56.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.1%. On the other hand Berkley Renewables has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emera has higher upside potential than Berkley Renewables, analysts believe Emera is more attractive than Berkley Renewables.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMA.TOEmera2 7 1 BKS.CXBerkley Renewables0 0 0 -
Is EMA.TO or BKS.CX More Risky?
Emera has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkley Renewables has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.362%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or BKS.CX?
Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.39%. Berkley Renewables offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Berkley Renewables pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or BKS.CX?
Emera quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Berkley Renewables quarterly revenues of --. Emera's net income of $22M is higher than Berkley Renewables's net income of --. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.96x while Berkley Renewables's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 2.06x versus 0.20x for Berkley Renewables. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMA.TOEmera2.06x 23.96x $1.8B $22M BKS.CXBerkley Renewables0.20x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or CPX.TO?
Capital Power has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 17.38%. Emera's return on equity of 5.72% beat Capital Power's return on equity of 15.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMA.TOEmera46.62% $0.01 $31.1B CPX.TOCapital Power55.73% $1.32 $8.8B -
What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or CPX.TO?
Emera has a consensus price target of $56.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.1%. On the other hand Capital Power has an analysts' consensus of $65.45 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Capital Power has higher upside potential than Emera, analysts believe Capital Power is more attractive than Emera.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMA.TOEmera2 7 1 CPX.TOCapital Power3 4 0 -
Is EMA.TO or CPX.TO More Risky?
Emera has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Power has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or CPX.TO?
Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.39%. Capital Power offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Power pays out 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or CPX.TO?
Emera quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Capital Power quarterly revenues of $1B. Emera's net income of $22M is lower than Capital Power's net income of $179M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.96x while Capital Power's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 2.06x versus 2.06x for Capital Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMA.TOEmera2.06x 23.96x $1.8B $22M CPX.TOCapital Power2.06x 15.02x $1B $179M
-
Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or CU.TO?
Canadian Utilities has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 1.48%. Emera's return on equity of 5.72% beat Canadian Utilities's return on equity of 7.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMA.TOEmera46.62% $0.01 $31.1B CU.TOCanadian Utilities70.99% -$0.03 $17.9B -
What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or CU.TO?
Emera has a consensus price target of $56.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.1%. On the other hand Canadian Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $37.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Canadian Utilities has higher upside potential than Emera, analysts believe Canadian Utilities is more attractive than Emera.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMA.TOEmera2 7 1 CU.TOCanadian Utilities1 5 0 -
Is EMA.TO or CU.TO More Risky?
Emera has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Utilities has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.421%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or CU.TO?
Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.39%. Canadian Utilities offers a yield of 5.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Utilities pays out 75.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or CU.TO?
Emera quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Canadian Utilities quarterly revenues of $810M. Emera's net income of $22M is higher than Canadian Utilities's net income of $12M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.96x while Canadian Utilities's PE ratio is 22.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 2.06x versus 2.51x for Canadian Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMA.TOEmera2.06x 23.96x $1.8B $22M CU.TOCanadian Utilities2.51x 22.20x $810M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or H.TO?
Hydro One has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 16.93%. Emera's return on equity of 5.72% beat Hydro One's return on equity of 9.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMA.TOEmera46.62% $0.01 $31.1B H.TOHydro One38.82% $0.62 $29.1B -
What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or H.TO?
Emera has a consensus price target of $56.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.1%. On the other hand Hydro One has an analysts' consensus of $44.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.11%. Given that Emera has higher upside potential than Hydro One, analysts believe Emera is more attractive than Hydro One.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMA.TOEmera2 7 1 H.TOHydro One0 10 0 -
Is EMA.TO or H.TO More Risky?
Emera has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydro One has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.009%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or H.TO?
Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.39%. Hydro One offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydro One pays out 64.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or H.TO?
Emera quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Hydro One quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Emera's net income of $22M is lower than Hydro One's net income of $371M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.96x while Hydro One's PE ratio is 23.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 2.06x versus 3.18x for Hydro One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMA.TOEmera2.06x 23.96x $1.8B $22M H.TOHydro One3.18x 23.26x $2.2B $371M
-
Which has Higher Returns EMA.TO or TA.TO?
TransAlta has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of -3.61%. Emera's return on equity of 5.72% beat TransAlta's return on equity of 10.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMA.TOEmera46.62% $0.01 $31.1B TA.TOTransAlta60.19% -$0.12 $6.1B -
What do Analysts Say About EMA.TO or TA.TO?
Emera has a consensus price target of $56.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.1%. On the other hand TransAlta has an analysts' consensus of $18.38 which suggests that it could fall by -5.96%. Given that Emera has higher upside potential than TransAlta, analysts believe Emera is more attractive than TransAlta.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMA.TOEmera2 7 1 TA.TOTransAlta3 2 0 -
Is EMA.TO or TA.TO More Risky?
Emera has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.753% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransAlta has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMA.TO or TA.TO?
Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.39%. TransAlta offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. TransAlta pays out 15.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMA.TO or TA.TO?
Emera quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than TransAlta quarterly revenues of $638M. Emera's net income of $22M is higher than TransAlta's net income of -$23M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.96x while TransAlta's PE ratio is 54.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 2.06x versus 2.13x for TransAlta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMA.TOEmera2.06x 23.96x $1.8B $22M TA.TOTransAlta2.13x 54.28x $638M -$23M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.06% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is down 0.53% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 6.25% over the past day.
