FTS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berkley Renewables, Inc. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.51% beat Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.77, signalling upside risk potential of 4.07%. On the other hand Berkley Renewables, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis, Inc. has higher upside potential than Berkley Renewables, Inc., analysts believe Fortis, Inc. is more attractive than Berkley Renewables, Inc..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkley Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Berkley Renewables, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Berkley Renewables, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Berkley Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $474M is higher than Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.06x while Berkley Renewables, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.95x versus 0.20x for Berkley Renewables, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boralex, Inc. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of -19.11%. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.51% beat Boralex, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.25%.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.77, signalling upside risk potential of 4.07%. On the other hand Boralex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.60 which suggests that it could grow by 40.6%. Given that Boralex, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fortis, Inc., analysts believe Boralex, Inc. is more attractive than Fortis, Inc..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boralex, Inc. has a beta of -0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.555%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Boralex, Inc. offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Boralex, Inc. pays out 188.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Boralex, Inc.'s is not.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Boralex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $157M. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $474M is higher than Boralex, Inc.'s net income of -$30M. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.06x while Boralex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 263.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.95x versus 3.14x for Boralex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.51% beat Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc.'s return on equity of -134.82%.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.77, signalling upside risk potential of 4.07%. On the other hand Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc., analysts believe Fortis, Inc. is more attractive than Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. has a beta of -0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.605%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $474M is higher than Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.06x while Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.95x versus -- for Greenbriar Sustainable Living, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.