ELF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sol Strategies, Inc. has a net margin of 57.31% compared to E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -324.27%. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.27% beat Sol Strategies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.19%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sol Strategies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1118.49%. Given that Sol Strategies, Inc. has higher upside potential than E-L Financial Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Sol Strategies, Inc. is more attractive than E-L Financial Corp. Ltd..

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sol Strategies, Inc. has a beta of 2.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.514%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Sol Strategies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. pays 3.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Sol Strategies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Sol Strategies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $650.9M is higher than Sol Strategies, Inc.'s net income of -$8.2M. Notably, E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Sol Strategies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is 1.92x versus 9.79x for Sol Strategies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Wellness Strategies has a net margin of 57.31% compared to E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.27% beat Global Wellness Strategies's return on equity of --.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Wellness Strategies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Wellness Strategies, analysts believe E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Global Wellness Strategies.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Wellness Strategies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Global Wellness Strategies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. pays 3.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Wellness Strategies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Global Wellness Strategies quarterly revenues of --. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $650.9M is higher than Global Wellness Strategies's net income of --. Notably, E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Global Wellness Strategies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is 1.92x versus -- for Global Wellness Strategies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a net margin of 57.31% compared to E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -3.32%. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.27% beat Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quinsam Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital Corp., analysts believe E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Quinsam Capital Corp..

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.05%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Quinsam Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. pays 3.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4M. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $650.9M is higher than Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K. Notably, E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Quinsam Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is 1.92x versus -- for Quinsam Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 57.31% compared to E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.27% beat New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, Inc., analysts believe E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures, Inc..

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, which suggesting that the stock is 20.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a beta of -0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.578%.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. pays 3.26% of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than New Frontier Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $650.9M is higher than New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5K. Notably, E-L Financial Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E-L Financial Corp. Ltd. is 1.92x versus 29.93x for New Frontier Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.