Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
53
CNL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.84
Seasonality move
:
44.23%
Day range:
$19.52 - $20.19
52-week range:
$6.07 - $21.14
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
21.61x
Volume:
383.9K
Avg. volume:
210.2K
1-year change:
224.67%
Market cap:
$1.8B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.82
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL.TO
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.11 | -- | -41.14% | $24.54 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$4.7B | $3.33 | 36.02% | 140.89% | $269.67 |
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -22.88% | $1.46 |
|
LIO.V
Lion One Metals Ltd.
|
$22.7M | $0.01 | 25.93% | -- | $0.60 |
|
LVG.V
Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $2.90 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL.TO
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
$19.87 | $24.54 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$241.25 | $269.67 | $121.1B | 25.24x | $0.56 | 0.93% | 8.23x |
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
$0.77 | $1.46 | $106M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LIO.V
Lion One Metals Ltd.
|
$0.31 | $0.60 | $122.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.33x |
|
LVG.V
Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.
|
$0.27 | $0.45 | $52.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
$1.02 | $2.90 | $401.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL.TO
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
14.06% | 0.898 | 0.81% | 4.52x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 1.337 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-- | -0.814 | -- | 14.98x |
|
LIO.V
Lion One Metals Ltd.
|
17.56% | 3.145 | 41.55% | 0.28x |
|
LVG.V
Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.
|
6.16% | 0.079 | 2.99% | 1.04x |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
0.1% | 3.660 | 0.05% | 7.05x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL.TO
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
-$280.3K | -$15.5M | -80.62% | -87.34% | -- | -$24.3M |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-$12.1K | -$4.3M | -75.51% | -75.51% | -- | -$3.4M |
|
LIO.V
Lion One Metals Ltd.
|
$6.7M | $4.9M | -0.48% | -0.59% | 27.02% | -$6.3M |
|
LVG.V
Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.
|
-$7.4K | -$1.1M | -27.24% | -30.12% | -- | -$1.1M |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
-$9.6K | -$1.1M | -2.37% | -2.37% | -- | -$4.8M |
Collective Mining Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of 34.48%. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.34% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.18 $98.7M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CNL.TO or AEM.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $24.54, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $269.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Collective Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., analysts believe Collective Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 3 1 -
Is CNL.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.446%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL.TO or AEM.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL.TO or AEM.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$14.9M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus 8.23x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$14.9M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.8.23x 25.24x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL.TO or AMC.TO?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.34% beat Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.18 $98.7M AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL.TO or AMC.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $24.54, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Arizona Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.46 which suggests that it could grow by 89.61%. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 -
Is CNL.TO or AMC.TO More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.592, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL.TO or AMC.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Arizona Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arizona Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL.TO or AMC.TO?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$14.9M is lower than Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Arizona Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus -- for Arizona Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$14.9M AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL.TO or LIO.V?
Lion One Metals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of 3.48%. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.34% beat Lion One Metals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.18 $98.7M LIO.VLion One Metals Ltd.36.88% $0.00 $249.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL.TO or LIO.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $24.54, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Lion One Metals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.60 which suggests that it could grow by 96.72%. Given that Lion One Metals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Lion One Metals Ltd. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 LIO.VLion One Metals Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is CNL.TO or LIO.V More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion One Metals Ltd. has a beta of 0.057, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.335%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL.TO or LIO.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lion One Metals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lion One Metals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL.TO or LIO.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lion One Metals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$14.9M is lower than Lion One Metals Ltd.'s net income of $633K. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lion One Metals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus 1.33x for Lion One Metals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$14.9M LIO.VLion One Metals Ltd.1.33x -- $18.2M $633K
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL.TO or LVG.V?
Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.34% beat Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.18 $98.7M LVG.VLake Victoria Gold Ltd.-- -$0.01 $16.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL.TO or LVG.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $24.54, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.45 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 LVG.VLake Victoria Gold Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is CNL.TO or LVG.V More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.009%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL.TO or LVG.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL.TO or LVG.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$14.9M is lower than Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus -- for Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$14.9M LVG.VLake Victoria Gold Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL.TO or TUD.V?
Tudor Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.34% beat Tudor Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -2.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.18 $98.7M TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.-- -$0.00 $214.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL.TO or TUD.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $24.54, signalling upside risk potential of 23.51%. On the other hand Tudor Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.90 which suggests that it could grow by 184.31%. Given that Tudor Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Tudor Gold Corp. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.2 0 0 -
Is CNL.TO or TUD.V More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tudor Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.762%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL.TO or TUD.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tudor Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tudor Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL.TO or TUD.V?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tudor Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$14.9M is lower than Tudor Gold Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tudor Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus -- for Tudor Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNL.TOCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$14.9M TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for Jan 6
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Buy
73
INOD alert for Jan 6
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
Buy
65
AVAV alert for Jan 6
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.
