Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
63
CMAG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.29
Seasonality move
:
6.36%
Day range:
$42.28 - $42.31
52-week range:
$32.89 - $44.79
Dividend yield:
0.21%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.2K
Avg. volume:
1.5K
1-year change:
10.62%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMAG.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDAY.NO
Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMAG.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF
|
$42.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 0.21% | -- |
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
$34.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QDAY.NO
Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF
|
$24.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 0% | -- |
|
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
|
$25.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 13.87% | -- |
|
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A
|
$29.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMAG.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.893 | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
QDAY.NO
Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.875 | -- | -- |
|
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A
|
-- | 1.070 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMAG.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDAY.NO
Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CMAG.TO or CNAO.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a net margin of -- compared to CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net margin of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMAG.TO or CNAO.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has higher upside potential than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD, analysts believe CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is more attractive than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF0 0 0 CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD0 0 0 -
Is CMAG.TO or CNAO.TO More Risky?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMAG.TO or CNAO.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMAG.TO or CNAO.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD quarterly revenues of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net income of --. Notably, CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is -- versus -- for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -- CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMAG.TO or FLSA.NO?
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net margin of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMAG.TO or FLSA.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF, analysts believe CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF0 0 0 FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMAG.TO or FLSA.NO More Risky?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMAG.TO or FLSA.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMAG.TO or FLSA.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMAG.TO or QDAY.NO?
Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net margin of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- QDAY.NOHamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMAG.TO or QDAY.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF, analysts believe CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is more attractive than Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF0 0 0 QDAY.NOHamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMAG.TO or QDAY.NO More Risky?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMAG.TO or QDAY.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMAG.TO or QDAY.NO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Hamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QDAY.NOHamilton Enhanced Technology DayMAX™ ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMAG.TO or QQCL.TO?
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net margin of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- QQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMAG.TO or QQCL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF, analysts believe CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is more attractive than Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF0 0 0 QQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMAG.TO or QQCL.TO More Risky?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMAG.TO or QQCL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 13.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMAG.TO or QQCL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMAG.TO or QQQL.TO?
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A has a net margin of -- compared to CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net margin of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- QQQL.TOGlobal X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMAG.TO or QQQL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A, analysts believe CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is more attractive than Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF0 0 0 QQQL.TOGlobal X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A0 0 0 -
Is CMAG.TO or QQQL.TO More Risky?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.475, which suggesting that the stock is 52.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMAG.TO or QQQL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMAG.TO or QQQL.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A quarterly revenues of --. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A's net income of --. Notably, CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMAG.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQQL.TOGlobal X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF Class A-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
