3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Sell
48
CNAO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.19
Seasonality move
:
1.66%
Day range:
$31.19 - $31.19
52-week range:
$23.15 - $31.91
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
34.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSFY.NO
Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
$31.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
$28.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MSFY.NO
Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
$18.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0% | -- |
|
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF
|
$37.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | -0.712 | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | 0.245 | -- | -- |
|
MSFY.NO
Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | 0.362 | -- | -- |
|
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.288 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNAO.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSFY.NO
Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNAO.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNAO.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has higher upside potential than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged, analysts believe CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is more attractive than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD0 0 0 CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged0 0 0 -
Is CNAO.TO or CMAG.U.TO More Risky?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNAO.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNAO.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is -- versus -- for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- -- CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNAO.TO or MSFY.NO?
Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- MSFY.NOMicrosoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNAO.TO or MSFY.NO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has higher upside potential than Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is more attractive than Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD0 0 0 MSFY.NOMicrosoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNAO.TO or MSFY.NO More Risky?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNAO.TO or MSFY.NO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNAO.TO or MSFY.NO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is -- versus -- for Microsoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- -- MSFY.NOMicrosoft (MSFT) Yield Shares Prps ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNAO.TO or PFLS.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNAO.TO or PFLS.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has higher upside potential than Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is more attractive than Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD0 0 0 PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNAO.TO or PFLS.TO More Risky?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNAO.TO or PFLS.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNAO.TO or PFLS.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is -- versus -- for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- -- PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNAO.TO or PHE.TO?
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net margin of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- PHE.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNAO.TO or PHE.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has higher upside potential than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF, analysts believe CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is more attractive than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD0 0 0 PHE.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNAO.TO or PHE.TO More Risky?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.201%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNAO.TO or PHE.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNAO.TO or PHE.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD is -- versus -- for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNAO.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF CAD-- -- -- -- PHE.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.06% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 6.4% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 0.48% over the past day.
