Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
61
CEQT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.84
Seasonality move
:
0.17%
Day range:
$30.87 - $30.87
52-week range:
$22.71 - $30.94
Dividend yield:
1.53%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
3K
1-year change:
20.99%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CESG.B.NO
CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
$30.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.53% | -- |
|
CESG.B.NO
CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.7% | -- |
|
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF
|
$57.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.03% | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
$50.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.01% | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.839 | -- | -- |
|
CESG.B.NO
CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | 0.882 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.868 | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CESG.B.NO
CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CEQT.TO or CESG.B.NO?
CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH has a net margin of -- compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CESG.B.NOCI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEQT.TO or CESG.B.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH, analysts believe CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CESG.B.NOCI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH0 0 0 -
Is CEQT.TO or CESG.B.NO More Risky?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEQT.TO or CESG.B.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEQT.TO or CESG.B.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH quarterly revenues of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH's net income of --. Notably, CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CESG.B.NOCI MSCI Wld ESG Ipt ETF UnH-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CEQT.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEQT.TO or DISC.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEQT.TO or ESGG.TO?
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ESGG.TOBMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEQT.TO or ESGG.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF, analysts believe CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ESGG.TOBMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CEQT.TO or ESGG.TO More Risky?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.742%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEQT.TO or ESGG.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEQT.TO or ESGG.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ESGG.TOBMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF, analysts believe CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO More Risky?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.101%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEQT.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF, analysts believe CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF0 0 0 -
Is CEQT.TO or QEF.NO More Risky?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.53%. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEQT.TO or QEF.NO?
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEQT.TOCI Equity Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 22
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 2.59% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 22
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is down 3.03% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 22
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 9.97% over the past day.
