VMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials Corp. has a net margin of 16.42% compared to Vulcan Materials Co.'s net margin of -78.02%. Vulcan Materials Co.'s return on equity of 13.6% beat MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a consensus price target of $320.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.42%. On the other hand MP Materials Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $79.29 which suggests that it could grow by 45.37%. Given that MP Materials Corp. has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials Co., analysts believe MP Materials Corp. is more attractive than Vulcan Materials Co..

Vulcan Materials Co. has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.479%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. MP Materials Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials Co. pays 26.86% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials Co. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.6M. Vulcan Materials Co.'s net income of $376.2M is higher than MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M. Notably, Vulcan Materials Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.81x while MP Materials Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials Co. is 4.94x versus 39.02x for MP Materials Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a net margin of 16.42% compared to Vulcan Materials Co.'s net margin of --. Vulcan Materials Co.'s return on equity of 13.6% beat NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of -139.19%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a consensus price target of $320.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.42%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $13.1667 which suggests that it could grow by 115.85%. Given that NioCorp Developments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials Co., analysts believe NioCorp Developments Ltd. is more attractive than Vulcan Materials Co..

Vulcan Materials Co. has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.838%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. NioCorp Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials Co. pays 26.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials Co. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Vulcan Materials Co.'s net income of $376.2M is higher than NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s net income of -$40.8M. Notably, Vulcan Materials Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.81x while NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials Co. is 4.94x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony Corp. has a net margin of 16.42% compared to Vulcan Materials Co.'s net margin of -54.94%. Vulcan Materials Co.'s return on equity of 13.6% beat United States Antimony Corp.'s return on equity of -13.12%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a consensus price target of $320.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.42%. On the other hand United States Antimony Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 60.31%. Given that United States Antimony Corp. has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials Co., analysts believe United States Antimony Corp. is more attractive than Vulcan Materials Co..

Vulcan Materials Co. has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony Corp. has a beta of 0.008, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.25%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. United States Antimony Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials Co. pays 26.86% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials Co. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than United States Antimony Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Vulcan Materials Co.'s net income of $376.2M is higher than United States Antimony Corp.'s net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Vulcan Materials Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.81x while United States Antimony Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials Co. is 4.94x versus 21.95x for United States Antimony Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 16.42% compared to Vulcan Materials Co.'s net margin of 38.02%. Vulcan Materials Co.'s return on equity of 13.6% beat United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.48%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a consensus price target of $320.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.42%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $125.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that Vulcan Materials Co. has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Vulcan Materials Co. is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals, Inc..

Vulcan Materials Co. has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.78%.

Vulcan Materials Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Vulcan Materials Co. pays 26.86% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. pays out 5.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials Co. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $102M. Vulcan Materials Co.'s net income of $376.2M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $38.8M. Notably, Vulcan Materials Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.81x while United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials Co. is 4.94x versus 10.02x for United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.