T Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 38.28%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 35.17%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $200.56 which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that Alphabet has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe Alphabet is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.65999999999999%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out 7.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $90.2B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $34.5B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 18.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.63x versus 5.71x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of -6.32%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 16.74%. Given that Lumen Technologies has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe Lumen Technologies is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.833%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. AT&T's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are larger than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.63x versus 0.31x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T-Mobile US has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 14.14%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat T-Mobile US's return on equity of 19.11%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand T-Mobile US has an analysts' consensus of $269.57 which suggests that it could grow by 11.09%. Given that T-Mobile US has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe T-Mobile US is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.284%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4%. T-Mobile US offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US pays out 29.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are larger than T-Mobile US quarterly revenues of $20.9B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is higher than T-Mobile US's net income of $3B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while T-Mobile US's PE ratio is 23.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.63x versus 3.41x for T-Mobile US. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verizon Communications has a net margin of 14.21% compared to AT&T's net margin of 14.57%. AT&T's return on equity of 9.84% beat Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02%.

AT&T has a consensus price target of $29.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Verizon Communications has an analysts' consensus of $48.07 which suggests that it could grow by 9.27%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than AT&T, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than AT&T.

AT&T has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.334%.

AT&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4%. Verizon Communications offers a yield of 6.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. AT&T pays 74.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications pays out 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AT&T quarterly revenues are $30.6B, which are smaller than Verizon Communications quarterly revenues of $33.5B. AT&T's net income of $4.4B is lower than Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B. Notably, AT&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Verizon Communications's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AT&T is 1.63x versus 1.37x for Verizon Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.