STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown-Forman Corp. has a net margin of 23.5% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 21.52%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Brown-Forman Corp.'s return on equity of 20.62%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Brown-Forman Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $30.26 which suggests that it could grow by 10.56%. Given that Brown-Forman Corp. has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, Inc., analysts believe Brown-Forman Corp. is more attractive than Constellation Brands, Inc..

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown-Forman Corp. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.343%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Brown-Forman Corp. offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman Corp. pays out 48.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Brown-Forman Corp. quarterly revenues of $1B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $522.2M is higher than Brown-Forman Corp.'s net income of $224M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Brown-Forman Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.96x versus 3.33x for Brown-Forman Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 23.5% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -8.42%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Celsius Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.10 which suggests that it could grow by 19.28%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, Inc., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Constellation Brands, Inc..

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.998%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Celsius Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $725.1M. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $522.2M is higher than Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 581.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.96x versus 6.16x for Celsius Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer Co., Inc. has a net margin of 23.5% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 8.59%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 9.92%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Boston Beer Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $240.15 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Boston Beer Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, Inc., analysts believe Boston Beer Co., Inc. is more attractive than Constellation Brands, Inc..

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.867%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Boston Beer Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Boston Beer Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $537.5M. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $522.2M is higher than Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s net income of $46.2M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.96x versus 1.20x for Boston Beer Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage Co. has a net margin of 23.5% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -98.77%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s return on equity of -16.14%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage Co. has an analysts' consensus of $51.10 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage Co., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage Co..

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage Co. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.699%.

Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Molson Coors Beverage Co. offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage Co. pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage Co. quarterly revenues of $3B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $522.2M is higher than Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s net income of -$2.9B. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s PE ratio is 9.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.96x versus 0.87x for Molson Coors Beverage Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.