Financhill
Buy
52

STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$141.09
Seasonality move :
6.57%
Day range:
$141.04 - $144.26
52-week range:
$126.45 - $226.22
Dividend yield:
2.83%
P/E ratio:
20.97x
P/S ratio:
2.67x
P/B ratio:
3.33x
Volume:
3.1M
Avg. volume:
2.5M
1-year change:
-35.56%
Market cap:
$25B
Revenue:
$10.2B
EPS (TTM):
$6.85

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$2.2B $2.63 -13.77% -22.13% $170.70
BF.B
Brown-Forman Corp.
$1B $0.48 -2.94% -18.59% $30.63
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$1.8B $0.88 7.39% 6.31% $76.92
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$29B $2.24 4.22% 102.3% $155.91
SAM
Boston Beer Co., Inc.
$382.6M -$2.54 -4.9% -24.77% $241.01
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Co.
$2.7B $1.17 1.54% -3.05% $50.95
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$143.65 $170.70 $25B 20.97x $1.02 2.83% 2.67x
BF.B
Brown-Forman Corp.
$26.10 $30.63 $12.1B 15.24x $0.23 3.49% 3.18x
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$66.35 $76.92 $17.8B 22.96x $0.48 2.76% 2.63x
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$138.96 $155.91 $190B 26.44x $1.42 4.05% 2.07x
SAM
Boston Beer Co., Inc.
$202.07 $241.01 $2.2B 23.82x $0.00 0% 1.14x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Co.
$46.19 $50.95 $9.1B 9.12x $0.47 4.07% 0.83x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
58.44% -1.414 36.83% 0.28x
BF.B
Brown-Forman Corp.
39.04% -1.275 20.76% 0.97x
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
43.1% -0.349 23.04% 0.24x
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
72.4% 0.163 24.97% 0.68x
SAM
Boston Beer Co., Inc.
4.3% -0.851 1.81% 1.33x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Co.
38.67% -1.112 70.1% 0.34x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$1.3B $866.7M 6.53% 16.4% 34.94% $634.8M
BF.B
Brown-Forman Corp.
$620M $307M 11.95% 20.62% 29.49% $107M
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$645.8M $293.3M 7.78% 14.05% 17% $206.1M
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$12.9B $3.9B 10.76% 38.53% 16.11% $3.5B
SAM
Boston Beer Co., Inc.
$273.1M $63.5M 9.49% 9.92% 11.81% $89.2M
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Co.
$1.1B $457.7M -10.78% -16.14% 15.39% $483M

Constellation Brands, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or BF.B?

    Brown-Forman Corp. has a net margin of 19.6% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 21.52%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4% beat Brown-Forman Corp.'s return on equity of 20.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman Corp.
    59.56% $0.47 $6.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Brown-Forman Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $30.63 which suggests that it could grow by 17.37%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown-Forman Corp., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Brown-Forman Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman Corp.
    2 11 3
  • Is STZ or BF.B More Risky?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown-Forman Corp. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Brown-Forman Corp. offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman Corp. pays out 48.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Brown-Forman Corp. quarterly revenues of $1B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M is higher than Brown-Forman Corp.'s net income of $224M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.97x while Brown-Forman Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.67x versus 3.18x for Brown-Forman Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.67x 20.97x $2.5B $486.1M
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman Corp.
    3.18x 15.24x $1B $224M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or MKC?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 19.6% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 13.07%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4% beat McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or MKC?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand McCormick & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.92 which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than McCormick & Co., Inc., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than McCormick & Co., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    5 8 0
  • Is STZ or MKC More Risky?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.294%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or MKC?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. McCormick & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays out 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or MKC?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M is higher than McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.97x while McCormick & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.67x versus 2.63x for McCormick & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.67x 20.97x $2.5B $486.1M
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.63x 22.96x $1.7B $225.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or PEP?

    PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of 19.6% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 10.94%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
    PEP
    PepsiCo, Inc.
    53.72% $1.90 $70.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $155.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.2%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
    PEP
    PepsiCo, Inc.
    4 15 2
  • Is STZ or PEP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.254%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M is lower than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.97x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.67x versus 2.07x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.67x 20.97x $2.5B $486.1M
    PEP
    PepsiCo, Inc.
    2.07x 26.44x $23.9B $2.6B
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or SAM?

    Boston Beer Co., Inc. has a net margin of 19.6% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 8.59%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4% beat Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 9.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
    SAM
    Boston Beer Co., Inc.
    50.81% $4.25 $951.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Boston Beer Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $241.01 which suggests that it could grow by 19.27%. Given that Boston Beer Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, Inc., analysts believe Boston Beer Co., Inc. is more attractive than Constellation Brands, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
    SAM
    Boston Beer Co., Inc.
    1 12 2
  • Is STZ or SAM More Risky?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.867%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Boston Beer Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Boston Beer Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $537.5M. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M is higher than Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s net income of $46.2M. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.97x while Boston Beer Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.67x versus 1.14x for Boston Beer Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.67x 20.97x $2.5B $486.1M
    SAM
    Boston Beer Co., Inc.
    1.14x 23.82x $537.5M $46.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or TAP?

    Molson Coors Beverage Co. has a net margin of 19.6% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -98.77%. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4% beat Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s return on equity of -16.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage Co.
    36.74% -$14.79 $17.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $170.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage Co. has an analysts' consensus of $50.95 which suggests that it could grow by 10.31%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage Co., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage Co.
    4 13 1
  • Is STZ or TAP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.447, which suggesting that the stock is 55.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage Co. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.699%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.83%. Molson Coors Beverage Co. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage Co. pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage Co. quarterly revenues of $3B. Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M is higher than Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s net income of -$2.9B. Notably, Constellation Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.97x while Molson Coors Beverage Co.'s PE ratio is 9.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands, Inc. is 2.67x versus 0.83x for Molson Coors Beverage Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.67x 20.97x $2.5B $486.1M
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage Co.
    0.83x 9.12x $3B -$2.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7

Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 58.95% over the past day.

Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7

Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 8.88% over the past day.

Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7

Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is up 2.99% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock