SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal Co. has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 15.73%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Fastenal Co.'s return on equity of 32.96%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $361.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand Fastenal Co. has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Snap-On, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fastenal Co., analysts believe Snap-On, Inc. is more attractive than Fastenal Co..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.782, which suggesting that the stock is 21.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal Co. has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.105%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Fastenal Co. offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 39.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal Co. pays out 77.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Fastenal Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $271.8M is lower than Fastenal Co.'s net income of $335.5M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Fastenal Co.'s PE ratio is 31.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.60x versus 4.57x for Fastenal Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 5.6%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.99%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $361.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $173.48 which suggests that it could fall by -11.68%. Given that Snap-On, Inc. has higher upside potential than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., analysts believe Snap-On, Inc. is more attractive than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.782, which suggesting that the stock is 21.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.63%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 39.57% of its earnings as a dividend. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. pays out 30.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $271.8M is higher than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.'s net income of $170.8M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.60x versus 1.62x for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Airlines Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 6.23%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.57%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $361.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand United Airlines Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $125.26 which suggests that it could grow by 11%. Given that United Airlines Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Snap-On, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.782, which suggesting that the stock is 21.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Airlines Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.056%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. United Airlines Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 39.57% of its earnings as a dividend. United Airlines Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-On, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than United Airlines Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $271.8M is lower than United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $949M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.60x versus 0.64x for United Airlines Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics, Inc. has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 29.35%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s return on equity of 373.73%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $361.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.35%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $250.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Verisk Analytics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe Verisk Analytics, Inc. is more attractive than Snap-On, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.782, which suggesting that the stock is 21.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics, Inc. has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.733%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Verisk Analytics, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 39.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics, Inc. pays out 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Verisk Analytics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $768.3M. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $271.8M is higher than Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s net income of $225.5M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.60x versus 10.15x for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.