SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Byrna Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 9.54%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.29% beat Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $371.44, signalling downside risk potential of -3.74%. On the other hand Byrna Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.80 which suggests that it could grow by 178.62%. Given that Byrna Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe Byrna Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Snap-On, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Byrna Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.008%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Byrna Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 46.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Byrna Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-On, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Byrna Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $35.2M. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $267M is higher than Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.11x while Byrna Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.97x versus 2.54x for Byrna Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cummins, Inc. has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 7.26%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.29% beat Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $371.44, signalling downside risk potential of -3.74%. On the other hand Cummins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $613.23 which suggests that it could grow by 0.4%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than Snap-On, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.946%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Cummins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 46.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc. pays out 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $267M is lower than Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.11x while Cummins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.97x versus 2.44x for Cummins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Griffon Corp. has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 9.92%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.29% beat Griffon Corp.'s return on equity of 32.39%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $371.44, signalling downside risk potential of -3.74%. On the other hand Griffon Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $114.14 which suggests that it could grow by 28.8%. Given that Griffon Corp. has higher upside potential than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe Griffon Corp. is more attractive than Snap-On, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon Corp. has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Griffon Corp. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 46.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon Corp. pays out 65.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Griffon Corp. quarterly revenues of $649.1M. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $267M is higher than Griffon Corp.'s net income of $64.4M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.11x while Griffon Corp.'s PE ratio is 96.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.97x versus 1.61x for Griffon Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Snap-On, Inc.'s net margin of 4.57%. Snap-On, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.29% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.41%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a consensus price target of $371.44, signalling downside risk potential of -3.74%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $401.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.36%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has more downside risk than Snap-On, Inc., analysts believe Snap-On, Inc. is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc..

Snap-On, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.263% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.608%.

Snap-On, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.38 per share. Snap-On, Inc. pays 46.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-On, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Snap-On, Inc.'s net income of $267M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s net income of $159M. Notably, Snap-On, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.11x while Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-On, Inc. is 3.97x versus 1.38x for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.