SLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Media & Community Trust has a net margin of -3.21% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of -36.29%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -3.16% beat Creative Media & Community Trust's return on equity of -6.37%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $70.06, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Creative Media & Community Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2972.88%. Given that Creative Media & Community Trust has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe Creative Media & Community Trust is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Media & Community Trust has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.551%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Creative Media & Community Trust offers a yield of 261.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. SL Green Realty pays -41.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Media & Community Trust pays out -76.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $229.7M, which are larger than Creative Media & Community Trust quarterly revenues of $28.6M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$7.4M is higher than Creative Media & Community Trust's net income of -$10.4M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Media & Community Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 5.39x versus 0.02x for Creative Media & Community Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Street Properties has a net margin of -3.21% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of -52.63%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -3.16% beat Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $70.06, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Franklin Street Properties has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.71%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.841%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Franklin Street Properties offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SL Green Realty pays -41.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Street Properties pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $229.7M, which are larger than Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues of $29.7M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$7.4M is higher than Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Street Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 5.39x versus 1.56x for Franklin Street Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of -3.21% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 28.17%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -3.16% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.68%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $70.06, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $72.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.12%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.13%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. SL Green Realty pays -41.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.21% of its earnings as a dividend.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $229.7M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $360.3M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$7.4M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $101.5M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 34.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 5.39x versus 9.41x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vornado Realty Trust has a net margin of -3.21% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of -0.82%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -3.16% beat Vornado Realty Trust's return on equity of 0.13%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $70.06, signalling upside risk potential of 3.01%. On the other hand Vornado Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $27.89 which suggests that it could fall by -9.4%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Vornado Realty Trust, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Vornado Realty Trust.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.806, which suggesting that the stock is 80.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vornado Realty Trust has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.592%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Vornado Realty Trust offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. SL Green Realty pays -41.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Vornado Realty Trust pays out 181.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $229.7M, which are smaller than Vornado Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $443.3M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$7.4M is lower than Vornado Realty Trust's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vornado Realty Trust's PE ratio is 371.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 5.39x versus 4.48x for Vornado Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.