SJM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -30.3% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 8.9%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $119.37, signalling upside risk potential of 7.51%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $27.70 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, which suggesting that the stock is 71.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.014%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 25.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.68x versus 1.04x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of -30.3% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 15.19%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $119.37, signalling upside risk potential of 7.51%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $66.77 which suggests that it could grow by 11.23%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, which suggesting that the stock is 71.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.636%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.68x versus 1.71x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -30.3% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 32.41%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $119.37, signalling upside risk potential of 7.51%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $33.04 which suggests that it could grow by 9.05%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, which suggesting that the stock is 71.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.68x versus 1.43x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of -30.3% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of -2.26%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $119.37, signalling upside risk potential of 7.51%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.86 which suggests that it could grow by 34.21%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, which suggesting that the stock is 71.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.375%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.68x versus 1.17x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.