RRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 34.86%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.74, signalling downside risk potential of -4.29%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.10 which suggests that it could grow by 22.4%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.626, which suggesting that the stock is 37.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.01x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.98x versus 2.80x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 23.86%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.74, signalling downside risk potential of -4.29%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $62.89 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.626, which suggesting that the stock is 37.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.863%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.01x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 6.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.98x versus 1.73x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 23.95%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 29.16%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.74, signalling downside risk potential of -4.29%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $36.41 which suggests that it could grow by 16.47%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.626, which suggesting that the stock is 37.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.848%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 5.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $580.3M. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $139M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.01x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.98x versus 1.43x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of -23.55%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.74, signalling downside risk potential of -4.29%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 323.73%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.626, which suggesting that the stock is 37.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.149%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$30.6M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.01x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.98x versus 0.68x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.