PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 5.85% compared to PVH's net margin of 6.79%. PVH's return on equity of 13.87% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $129.93, signalling upside risk potential of 23.18%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $41.24 which suggests that it could grow by 30.84%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than PVH, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than PVH.

PVH has a beta of 2.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.974%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. PVH pays 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. PVH's net income of $131.9M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $234M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.69x versus 0.51x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 5.85% compared to PVH's net margin of -5.69%. PVH's return on equity of 13.87% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $129.93, signalling upside risk potential of 23.18%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $95.65 which suggests that it could grow by 37.13%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than PVH, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than PVH.

PVH has a beta of 2.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.033%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. PVH pays 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. PVH's net income of $131.9M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 99.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.69x versus 0.82x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro has a net margin of 5.85% compared to PVH's net margin of 17.42%. PVH's return on equity of 13.87% beat Hasbro's return on equity of -46.99%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $129.93, signalling upside risk potential of 23.18%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $79.23 which suggests that it could grow by 39.49%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than PVH, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than PVH.

PVH has a beta of 2.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.753%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. PVH pays 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out -26.05% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.3B. PVH's net income of $131.9M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $223.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Hasbro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.69x versus 1.84x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 5.85% compared to PVH's net margin of 1.87%. PVH's return on equity of 13.87% beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $129.93, signalling upside risk potential of 23.18%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.78%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Monro.

PVH has a beta of 2.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.389%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Monro offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. PVH pays 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. PVH's net income of $131.9M is higher than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Monro's PE ratio is 27.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.69x versus 0.62x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.