PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -155.79%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 0.71%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Lucid Group.

PVH has a beta of 1.808, which suggesting that the stock is 80.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.49x versus 7.58x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Levi Strauss & has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of 8.84%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & has an analysts' consensus of $18.84 which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

PVH has a beta of 1.808, which suggesting that the stock is 80.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.26%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Levi Strauss & offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & pays out 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues of $1.5B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Levi Strauss &'s PE ratio is 19.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.49x versus 1.09x for Levi Strauss &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -43.95%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.06 which suggests that it could fall by -1.41%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

PVH has a beta of 1.808, which suggesting that the stock is 80.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.49x versus 3.00x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of 2.12%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $95.57, signalling upside risk potential of 28.37%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.96%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Tesla.

PVH has a beta of 1.808, which suggesting that the stock is 80.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Tesla's PE ratio is 163.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.49x versus 10.92x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.