PRU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aflac has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of -3.06%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat Aflac's return on equity of 16%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $119.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand Aflac has an analysts' consensus of $105.77 which suggests that it could grow by 2.04%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Aflac.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aflac has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.728%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Aflac offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac pays out 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Aflac quarterly revenues of $3B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is higher than Aflac's net income of -$93M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while Aflac's PE ratio is 15.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.59x versus 3.40x for Aflac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 8.97%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $119.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.798%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.59x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 11.42%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $119.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 11.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.59x versus 1.29x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 7.35%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat MetLife's return on equity of 13.1%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $119.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.08%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $92.54 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.296, which suggesting that the stock is 29.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.465%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 111.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MetLife's is not.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while MetLife's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.59x versus 0.85x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.