PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 4.65%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $704.38, signalling upside risk potential of 9.8%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $154.62 which suggests that it could grow by 28.22%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.729, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.888%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.70x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 21.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.23x versus 1.67x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illinois Tool Works has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 18.23%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Illinois Tool Works's return on equity of 105.72%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $704.38, signalling upside risk potential of 9.8%. On the other hand Illinois Tool Works has an analysts' consensus of $246.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.45%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than Illinois Tool Works, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than Illinois Tool Works.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.348%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Illinois Tool Works offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 48.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Illinois Tool Works quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Illinois Tool Works's net income of $700M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.70x while Illinois Tool Works's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.23x versus 4.57x for Illinois Tool Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of -697.46%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $704.38, signalling upside risk potential of 9.8%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.15 which suggests that it could grow by 152.29%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.686%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.70x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.23x versus 1.06x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 7.56%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $704.38, signalling upside risk potential of 9.8%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than RTX.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 36.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. RTX offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.70x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.23x versus 2.12x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.