PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve Corp. has a net margin of 15.89% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net margin of 19.06%. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21% beat Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a consensus price target of $962.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.73%. On the other hand Flowserve Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $80.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that Parker-Hannifin Corp. has higher upside potential than Flowserve Corp., analysts believe Parker-Hannifin Corp. is more attractive than Flowserve Corp..

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.453%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Flowserve Corp. offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve Corp. pays out 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M is higher than Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M. Notably, Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Flowserve Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker-Hannifin Corp. is 6.01x versus 2.19x for Flowserve Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 15.89% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net margin of 19.35%. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a consensus price target of $962.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.73%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $356.18 which suggests that it could grow by 21.2%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Parker-Hannifin Corp., analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Parker-Hannifin Corp..

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.029%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 36.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker-Hannifin Corp. is 6.01x versus 6.89x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 15.89% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net margin of 4.68%. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21% beat Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a consensus price target of $962.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.73%. On the other hand Helios Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.6%. Given that Parker-Hannifin Corp. has higher upside potential than Helios Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Parker-Hannifin Corp. is more attractive than Helios Technologies, Inc..

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.126%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Helios Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays out 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $220.3M. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M is higher than Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M. Notably, Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Helios Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker-Hannifin Corp. is 6.01x versus 2.72x for Helios Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 15.89% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net margin of 13.18%. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a consensus price target of $962.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.73%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $512.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.71%. Given that Parker-Hannifin Corp. has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, Inc., analysts believe Parker-Hannifin Corp. is more attractive than RBC Bearings, Inc..

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.715%.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M is higher than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 61.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker-Hannifin Corp. is 6.01x versus 9.21x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.