PGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 24.7%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $276.5625, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.14%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.988% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.44x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.96x versus 1.88x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 11.42%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $276.5625, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Progressive.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.988% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.44x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.96x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 10.59%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $276.5625, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.72 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.988% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.44x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.96x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 10.83%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $276.5625, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $64.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.5%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.988% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.058%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.44x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.96x versus 1.80x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.