PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 19.01%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $176.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $75.28 which suggests that it could grow by 4.76%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.72%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.83x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 29.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.93x versus 6.60x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 5.48%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $176.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $160.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.83x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 20.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.93x versus 2.14x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of -5.97%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $176.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $153.99 which suggests that it could fall by -3.81%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.48%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.83x while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 35.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.93x versus 6.58x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.91%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $176.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $106.5937 which suggests that it could grow by 13.62%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.756%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.83x while Walmart's PE ratio is 38.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.93x versus 1.12x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.