PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 29.32%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 44.72%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $169.05, signalling upside risk potential of 15.22%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than The Coca-Cola Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than The Coca-Cola Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.534%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 78.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 23.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.23x versus 6.40x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International, Inc. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 7.66%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat Mondelez International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.31%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $169.05, signalling upside risk potential of 15.22%. On the other hand Mondelez International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $69.02 which suggests that it could grow by 23.19%. Given that Mondelez International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble Co., analysts believe Mondelez International, Inc. is more attractive than Procter & Gamble Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International, Inc. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.206%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Mondelez International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International, Inc. pays out 52.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than Mondelez International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than Mondelez International, Inc.'s net income of $746M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Mondelez International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.23x versus 1.95x for Mondelez International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 10.94%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $169.05, signalling upside risk potential of 15.22%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $153.91 which suggests that it could grow by 3.95%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.023%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.23x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International, Inc. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 33.27%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat Philip Morris International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $169.05, signalling upside risk potential of 15.22%. On the other hand Philip Morris International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $182.94 which suggests that it could grow by 20.58%. Given that Philip Morris International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble Co., analysts believe Philip Morris International, Inc. is more attractive than Procter & Gamble Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International, Inc. has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.869%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Philip Morris International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International, Inc. pays out 117.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International, Inc.'s is not.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than Philip Morris International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than Philip Morris International, Inc.'s net income of $3.6B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Philip Morris International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.23x versus 5.93x for Philip Morris International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.