PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a net margin of 19.5% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of -0.1%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 287.39%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive Co. has an analysts' consensus of $96.42 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.290, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.969%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Colgate-Palmolive Co. offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays out 78.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.3B is higher than Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of -$5M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.82x while Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s PE ratio is 36.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.60x versus 3.78x for Colgate-Palmolive Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Clorox Co. has a net margin of 19.5% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 9.62%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat The Clorox Co.'s return on equity of 398.55%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand The Clorox Co. has an analysts' consensus of $122.76 which suggests that it could fall by -0.11%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than The Clorox Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than The Clorox Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Clorox Co. has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.538%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. The Clorox Co. offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. The Clorox Co. pays out 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than The Clorox Co. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.3B is higher than The Clorox Co.'s net income of $161M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.82x while The Clorox Co.'s PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.60x versus 2.25x for The Clorox Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of 19.5% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 19.37%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 43.26%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $82.63 which suggests that it could grow by 3.49%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than The Coca-Cola Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than The Coca-Cola Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.476%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 67.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.3B is higher than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $2.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.82x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 26.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.60x versus 7.12x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of 19.5% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 8.71%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 31.41% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.5%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.49%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $170.38 which suggests that it could grow by 3.3%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.625%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.3B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.3B is higher than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.82x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.60x versus 2.41x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.