Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
$6.1B | $1.07 | -23.32% | -35.6% | $111.21 |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
$8.1B | $5.06 | -4.2% | 67.41% | $534.30 |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.2B | $1.81 | -5.3% | -15.83% | $206.53 |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
$19.8B | $6.48 | 6.56% | 191.21% | $523.95 |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
$2.6B | $2.31 | -1.01% | -1.12% | $151.70 |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
$11.5M | -$0.80 | 0.23% | -69.1% | $7.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
$112.92 | $111.21 | $59.3B | 22.10x | $1.40 | 1.17% | 2.02x |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
$531.70 | $534.30 | $73.4B | 27.60x | $2.00 | 1.44% | 2.19x |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
$148.68 | $206.53 | $8.7B | 28.30x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.03x |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
$511.57 | $523.95 | $118.4B | 28.56x | $3.45 | 2.61% | 1.64x |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
$136.71 | $151.70 | $8.6B | 13.33x | $0.51 | 1.49% | 0.86x |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
$2.00 | $7.00 | $22.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.33x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
45.01% | 0.977 | 30.7% | 1.87x |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
40.41% | 1.608 | 13.79% | 0.93x |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
34.95% | 1.946 | 14.45% | 0.89x |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
78.21% | -0.017 | 19.33% | 0.93x |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
21% | 2.537 | 14.65% | 0.94x |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
45.53% | -0.126 | 85.2% | 1.14x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
$951.4M | $623.7M | 7.85% | 14.55% | 9.35% | $1.2B |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
$2.1B | $961M | 13.75% | 22.96% | 11.56% | $1B |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
$402M | $103.4M | 7.69% | 12.02% | 9.28% | $96.5M |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
$2.2B | $2.2B | 15.37% | 66.18% | 12.04% | $3.3B |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
$456.6M | $260.4M | 11.71% | 15.51% | 9.69% | $432M |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
$2.5M | -$7M | -48.28% | -108.89% | -42.39% | $3.1M |
Cummins, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 6.72%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
14.26% | $1.12 | $35.2B |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
25.19% | $3.86 | $21.3B |
PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -1.52%. On the other hand Cummins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $534.30 which suggests that it could grow by 0.49%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
7 | 13 | 0 |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
8 | 11 | 0 |
PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.97%.
PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Cummins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc. pays out 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.10x while Cummins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.02x versus 2.19x for Cummins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
2.02x | 22.10x | $6.7B | $590M |
|
CMI
Cummins, Inc.
|
2.19x | 27.60x | $8.3B | $559M |
Generac Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 5.98%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Generac Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.02%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
14.26% | $1.12 | $35.2B |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
36.07% | $1.12 | $4.1B |
PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -1.52%. On the other hand Generac Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $206.53 which suggests that it could grow by 38.91%. Given that Generac Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Generac Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
7 | 13 | 0 |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
11 | 7 | 0 |
PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.825, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.459%.
PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Generac Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Generac Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Generac Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $66.6M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.10x while Generac Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.02x versus 2.03x for Generac Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
2.02x | 22.10x | $6.7B | $590M |
|
GNRC
Generac Holdings, Inc.
|
2.03x | 28.30x | $1.1B | $66.6M |
Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 8.7%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 66.18%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
14.26% | $1.12 | $35.2B |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
12.04% | $6.95 | $28.4B |
PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -1.52%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $523.95 which suggests that it could grow by 2.42%. Given that Lockheed Martin Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Lockheed Martin Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
7 | 13 | 0 |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
4 | 14 | 1 |
PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.243, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.733%.
PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 57.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.6B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.10x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.02x versus 1.64x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
2.02x | 22.10x | $6.7B | $590M |
|
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corp.
|
1.64x | 28.56x | $18.6B | $1.6B |
Oshkosh Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 7.3%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Oshkosh Corp.'s return on equity of 15.51%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
14.26% | $1.12 | $35.2B |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
16.98% | $3.04 | $5.7B |
PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -1.52%. On the other hand Oshkosh Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $151.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.96%. Given that Oshkosh Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Oshkosh Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
7 | 13 | 0 |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
9 | 4 | 0 |
PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh Corp. has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.776%.
PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Oshkosh Corp. offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh Corp. pays out 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Oshkosh Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Oshkosh Corp.'s net income of $196.2M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.10x while Oshkosh Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.02x versus 0.86x for Oshkosh Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
2.02x | 22.10x | $6.7B | $590M |
|
OSK
Oshkosh Corp.
|
0.86x | 13.33x | $2.7B | $196.2M |
Xos, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 12.87%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Xos, Inc.'s return on equity of -108.89%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
14.26% | $1.12 | $35.2B |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
15.34% | $0.22 | $57M |
PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -1.52%. On the other hand Xos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 250%. Given that Xos, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Xos, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
7 | 13 | 0 |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Xos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Xos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $16.5M. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Xos, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.10x while Xos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.02x versus 0.33x for Xos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCAR
PACCAR, Inc.
|
2.02x | 22.10x | $6.7B | $590M |
|
XOS
Xos, Inc.
|
0.33x | -- | $16.5M | $2.1M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.