PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Bird Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 8.92%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Blue Bird Corp.'s return on equity of 63.42%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $108.65, signalling downside risk potential of -2.61%. On the other hand Blue Bird Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.59%. Given that Blue Bird Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Blue Bird Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Bird Corp. has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.344%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Blue Bird Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Bird Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Blue Bird Corp. quarterly revenues of $409.4M. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Blue Bird Corp.'s net income of $36.5M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Blue Bird Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 1.12x for Blue Bird Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

3M Co. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 12.91%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat 3M Co.'s return on equity of 77.16%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $108.65, signalling downside risk potential of -2.61%. On the other hand 3M Co. has an analysts' consensus of $174.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.17%. Given that 3M Co. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe 3M Co. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3M Co. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.983%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. 3M Co. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co. pays out 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than 3M Co. quarterly revenues of $6.5B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is lower than 3M Co.'s net income of $841M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while 3M Co.'s PE ratio is 26.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 3.70x for 3M Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 7.3%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Oshkosh Corp.'s return on equity of 15.51%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $108.65, signalling downside risk potential of -2.61%. On the other hand Oshkosh Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $151.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.12%. Given that Oshkosh Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Oshkosh Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh Corp. has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.06%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Oshkosh Corp. offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh Corp. pays out 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Oshkosh Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Oshkosh Corp.'s net income of $196.2M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Oshkosh Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 0.83x for Oshkosh Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 12.87%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Xos, Inc.'s return on equity of -108.89%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $108.65, signalling downside risk potential of -2.61%. On the other hand Xos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 201.72%. Given that Xos, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Xos, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Xos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Xos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $16.5M. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Xos, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Xos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 0.38x for Xos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.