PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar, Inc. has a net margin of 8.16% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 12.55%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.76% beat Caterpillar, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.22%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Caterpillar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $739.29 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that PACCAR, Inc. has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, Inc., analysts believe PACCAR, Inc. is more attractive than Caterpillar, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar, Inc. has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.614%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Caterpillar, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.51 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 29.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar, Inc. pays out 31.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Caterpillar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.1B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $556.9M is lower than Caterpillar, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Caterpillar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 38.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.19x versus 5.01x for Caterpillar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cummins, Inc. has a net margin of 8.16% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 7.26%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.76% beat Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Cummins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $619.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.397%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Cummins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 29.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc. pays out 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $556.9M is lower than Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Cummins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.19x versus 2.26x for Cummins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh Corp. has a net margin of 8.16% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 4.98%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.76% beat Oshkosh Corp.'s return on equity of 14.77%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Oshkosh Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.06%. Given that Oshkosh Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Oshkosh Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh Corp. has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.922%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Oshkosh Corp. offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 29.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh Corp. pays out 19.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Oshkosh Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $556.9M is higher than Oshkosh Corp.'s net income of $133.8M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Oshkosh Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.19x versus 0.90x for Oshkosh Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos, Inc. has a net margin of 8.16% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of -186.82%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.76% beat Xos, Inc.'s return on equity of -96.57%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Xos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 129.89%. Given that Xos, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Xos, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Xos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 29.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Xos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $556.9M is higher than Xos, Inc.'s net income of -$9.8M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Xos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 2.19x versus 0.35x for Xos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.