PBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forward Air Corp. has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net margin of -3.76%. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Forward Air Corp.'s return on equity of -55.76%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.67, signalling upside risk potential of 39.88%. On the other hand Forward Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.27%. Given that Pitney Bowes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Forward Air Corp., analysts believe Pitney Bowes, Inc. is more attractive than Forward Air Corp..

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air Corp. has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.828%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Forward Air Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Pitney Bowes, Inc. pays 356.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.7M, which are smaller than Forward Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $631.8M. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than Forward Air Corp.'s net income of -$23.8M. Notably, Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.72x while Forward Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitney Bowes, Inc. is 0.91x versus 0.31x for Forward Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net margin of 3.1%. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.67, signalling upside risk potential of 39.88%. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.24 which suggests that it could fall by -2.53%. Given that Pitney Bowes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Pitney Bowes, Inc. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.727%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pitney Bowes, Inc. pays 356.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s is not.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.7M, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.72x while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitney Bowes, Inc. is 0.91x versus 0.67x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net margin of 0.56%. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.67, signalling upside risk potential of 39.88%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 30.82%. Given that Pitney Bowes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Pitney Bowes, Inc. is more attractive than Radiant Logistics, Inc..

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.449%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Radiant Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pitney Bowes, Inc. pays 356.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.7M, which are larger than Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.72x while Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitney Bowes, Inc. is 0.91x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net margin of -3079.54%. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -122.81%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.67, signalling upside risk potential of 39.88%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1337.25%. Given that Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitney Bowes, Inc., analysts believe Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Pitney Bowes, Inc..

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has a beta of 2.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.76%.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.07%. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pitney Bowes, Inc. pays 356.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. quarterly revenues are $459.7M, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of $307.9K. Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Pitney Bowes, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.72x while Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitney Bowes, Inc. is 0.91x versus 1.46x for Singularity Future Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.