NRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 15.83%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $109.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.92%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $323.07 which suggests that it could grow by 54.43%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is lower than Constellation Energy's net income of $852M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.72x versus 2.80x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duke Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 16.37%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 8.94%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $109.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.92%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $123.77 which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that NRG Energy has higher upside potential than Duke Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Duke Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.095%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 20.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.72x versus 2.99x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 4.58%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 15.67%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $109.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.92%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $404.65 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that GE Vernova has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe GE Vernova is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $10.6B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is higher than GE Vernova's net income of $484M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 54.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.72x versus 2.40x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 10.92%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $109.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.92%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $172.94 which suggests that it could grow by 39.46%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.355%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.70x while Vistra's PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.72x versus 2.52x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.