NRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 16.72%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $151.58, signalling downside risk potential of -1.53%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.08 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.135, which suggesting that the stock is 13.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.695%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.09x versus 2.89x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entergy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 12.73%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Entergy's return on equity of 9%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $151.58, signalling downside risk potential of -1.53%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $89.02 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Entergy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Entergy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.135, which suggesting that the stock is 13.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.42%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.8B. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than Entergy's net income of $362.4M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while Entergy's PE ratio is 26.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.09x versus 2.98x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TXNM Energy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 1.88%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity of 8.14%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $151.58, signalling downside risk potential of -1.53%. On the other hand TXNM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $58.89 which suggests that it could grow by 3.69%. Given that TXNM Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe TXNM Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.135, which suggesting that the stock is 13.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.907%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. TXNM Energy offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. TXNM Energy pays out 57.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than TXNM Energy quarterly revenues of $482.8M. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than TXNM Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while TXNM Energy's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.09x versus 2.56x for TXNM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of -6.81%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Vistra's return on equity of 36.03%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $151.58, signalling downside risk potential of -1.53%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $173.41 which suggests that it could fall by -3.61%. Given that Vistra has more downside risk than NRG Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.135, which suggesting that the stock is 13.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.537%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $3.9B. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than Vistra's net income of -$268M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.99x while Vistra's PE ratio is 27.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.09x versus 3.41x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.