CEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oklo has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of --. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01% beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $282.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.53%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.55%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than Oklo, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than Oklo.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B is higher than Oklo's net income of -$10M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.00x versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 19.68%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01% beat Public Service Enterprise Group's return on equity of 12.98%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $282.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.53%. On the other hand Public Service Enterprise Group has an analysts' consensus of $89.01 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than Public Service Enterprise Group, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.333%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Public Service Enterprise Group offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Constellation Energy pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Service Enterprise Group pays out 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Public Service Enterprise Group quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B is higher than Public Service Enterprise Group's net income of $520M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Public Service Enterprise Group's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.00x versus 4.08x for Public Service Enterprise Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 30.27%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $282.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.53%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.65%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.00x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 30.03%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $282.71, signalling upside risk potential of 24.53%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $160.46 which suggests that it could grow by 14.66%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.026%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Constellation Energy pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.03x while Vistra's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 3.00x versus -- for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.