MPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 6.7%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.37, signalling upside risk potential of 11.59%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $176.76 which suggests that it could grow by 6.52%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Chevron.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.425% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.132%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Chevron offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33.1B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.37x versus 1.56x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 0.02%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.37, signalling upside risk potential of 11.59%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.55 which suggests that it could grow by 11.2%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.425% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33.1B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.37x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 0.91%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.37, signalling upside risk potential of 11.59%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.42 which suggests that it could grow by 13.62%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.425% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.365%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33.1B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 15.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.37x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 9.39%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $166.37, signalling upside risk potential of 11.59%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $129.06 which suggests that it could grow by 11.74%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.425% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33.1B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.37x versus 1.46x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.