MPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron Corp. has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net margin of 6.21%. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 24.72% beat Chevron Corp.'s return on equity of 7.5%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a consensus price target of $199.56, signalling downside risk potential of -1.82%. On the other hand Chevron Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $181.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.13%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has more downside risk than Chevron Corp., analysts believe Chevron Corp. is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron Corp. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.851%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Chevron Corp. offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron Corp. pays out 103.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chevron Corp.'s is not.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.8B, which are smaller than Chevron Corp. quarterly revenues of $45.8B. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2B is lower than Chevron Corp.'s net income of $2.8B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Chevron Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum Corp. is 0.47x versus 1.85x for Chevron Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net margin of 8.58%. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 24.72% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 15.73%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a consensus price target of $199.56, signalling downside risk potential of -1.82%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $155.70 which suggests that it could fall by -2.55%. Given that Phillips 66 has more downside risk than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.972%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.8B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.1B. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2B is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum Corp. is 0.47x versus 0.49x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net margin of 3.85%. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 24.72% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a consensus price target of $199.56, signalling downside risk potential of -1.82%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $198.22 which suggests that it could fall by -0.97%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has more downside risk than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.613%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.8B, which are larger than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2B is higher than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum Corp. is 0.47x versus 0.50x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net margin of 8.26%. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 24.72% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.06%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a consensus price target of $199.56, signalling downside risk potential of -1.82%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $140.92 which suggests that it could fall by -5.08%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has more downside risk than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Exxon Mobil Corp..

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.193%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 59.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.8B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $80B. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2B is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum Corp. is 0.47x versus 1.98x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.