MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 26.49%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.9%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.99%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.60x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.9%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.08%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than MetLife, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than MetLife, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.77x versus 2.00x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.9%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.83 which suggests that it could fall by -0.67%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 8.29%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.79%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.9%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.21 which suggests that it could grow by 2.07%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.401%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 69.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.71x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.