MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 23.07%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 40.9%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.66%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $240.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.68%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Allstate Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than The Allstate Corp..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, which suggesting that the stock is 23.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.46%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.8B, which are larger than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.6B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.8B. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.41x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.83x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 26.49%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.66%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.6%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, which suggesting that the stock is 23.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.358%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.8B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M is higher than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.41x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.59x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 15.32%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.47%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.66%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.08 which suggests that it could grow by 12.73%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, which suggesting that the stock is 23.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.914%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.8B, which are larger than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.41x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.41x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 6%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.25%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.66%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $114.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, which suggesting that the stock is 23.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.534%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.8B, which are larger than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.7B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $941M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.41x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.61x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.