MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.35%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than MetLife, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than MetLife, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.76x versus 2.00x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could grow by 1.3%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.76x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 24.13%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $298.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Primerica, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Primerica, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.941%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.76x versus 2.62x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 8.29%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.79%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.93 which suggests that it could grow by 3.47%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.717% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.401%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 69.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.76x versus 0.70x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.