MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assurant has a net margin of 5.17% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.77%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.75% beat Assurant's return on equity of 13.14%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Assurant has an analysts' consensus of $233.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than MetLife, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than MetLife.

MetLife has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assurant has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.289%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Assurant offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant pays out 20.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.3B, which are larger than Assurant quarterly revenues of $3.1B. MetLife's net income of $945M is higher than Assurant's net income of $146.6M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Assurant's PE ratio is 15.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.76x versus 0.85x for Assurant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 5.17% compared to MetLife's net margin of 3.62%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.75% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $227.59 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Allstate.

MetLife has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.959%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.3B, which are larger than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. MetLife's net income of $945M is higher than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.76x versus 0.81x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 5.17% compared to MetLife's net margin of -11.55%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.75% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 5.96%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

MetLife has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.474%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.3B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. MetLife's net income of $945M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 6.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.76x versus 0.52x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 5.17% compared to MetLife's net margin of 5.22%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.75% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $113.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

MetLife has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.281%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 5.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.3B, which are larger than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $13.5B. MetLife's net income of $945M is higher than Prudential Financial's net income of $707M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.76x versus 0.62x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.