MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 20.34%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than MetLife, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than MetLife, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.764, which suggesting that the stock is 23.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.234%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.75x versus 1.97x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could grow by 4.05%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.764, which suggesting that the stock is 23.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.41%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.40x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 24.13%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $298.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.47%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Primerica, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Primerica, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.764, which suggesting that the stock is 23.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.704%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.75x versus 2.60x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 5.2% compared to MetLife, Inc.'s net margin of 8.29%. MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.79%.

MetLife, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.47, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $117.93 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.764, which suggesting that the stock is 23.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.725%.

MetLife, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife, Inc. pays 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 69.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.9B. MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, MetLife, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.70x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.