LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 28.89%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 64.03% beat Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.5%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $274.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Applied Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $398.7273 which suggests that it could grow by 2.66%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.786, which suggesting that the stock is 78.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.492%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Applied Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials, Inc. pays out 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.27x while Applied Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 14.59x versus 10.10x for Applied Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandisk has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of --. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 64.03% beat Sandisk's return on equity of --.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $274.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Sandisk has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Sandisk, analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than Sandisk.

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.786, which suggesting that the stock is 78.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandisk has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Sandisk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandisk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Sandisk quarterly revenues of --. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Sandisk's net income of --. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.27x while Sandisk's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 14.59x versus -- for Sandisk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 20.99%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 64.03% beat Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of --.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $274.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $467.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc, analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc.

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.786, which suggesting that the stock is 78.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.620, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.009%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays out 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $593M. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.27x while Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 48.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 14.59x versus 9.40x for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital Corp. has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 59.76%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 64.03% beat Western Digital Corp.'s return on equity of 55.72%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $274.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Western Digital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $321.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.38%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Western Digital Corp., analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than Western Digital Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.786, which suggesting that the stock is 78.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital Corp. has a beta of 1.800, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.952%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Western Digital Corp. offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital Corp. pays out 2.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Western Digital Corp. quarterly revenues of $3B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than Western Digital Corp.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.27x while Western Digital Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 14.59x versus 9.69x for Western Digital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.