LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 27.9%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $160.30, signalling upside risk potential of 0.34%. On the other hand Applied Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.7188 which suggests that it could fall by -8.16%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than Applied Materials, Inc..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.052%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Applied Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials, Inc. pays out 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Applied Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 10.45x versus 7.65x for Applied Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CoreWeave has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of --. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $160.30, signalling upside risk potential of 0.34%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lam Research Corp. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 10.45x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 35.72%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $160.30, signalling upside risk potential of 0.34%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $625.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.91%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Lam Research Corp., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.205%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 10.45x versus 12.14x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 40.37%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $160.30, signalling upside risk potential of 0.34%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $185.76 which suggests that it could grow by 5.5%. Given that Palantir Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lam Research Corp., analysts believe Palantir Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.467%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.20x while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 411.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 10.45x versus 115.41x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.