LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 27.9%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Applied Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.26%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $169.83, signalling downside risk potential of -12.8%. On the other hand Applied Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $261.1875 which suggests that it could fall by -8.14%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has more downside risk than Applied Materials, Inc., analysts believe Applied Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.41%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials, Inc. pays out 20.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Applied Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is lower than Applied Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.92x while Applied Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 12.74x versus 8.10x for Applied Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor, Inc. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 7.73%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $169.83, signalling downside risk potential of -12.8%. On the other hand FormFactor, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $58.38 which suggests that it could fall by -6.88%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has more downside risk than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe FormFactor, Inc. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.818%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. FormFactor, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues of $202.7M. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.92x while FormFactor, Inc.'s PE ratio is 119.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 12.74x versus 6.42x for FormFactor, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 20.88%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's return on equity of --.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $169.83, signalling downside risk potential of -12.8%. On the other hand Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $297.09 which suggests that it could grow by 2.51%. Given that Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Lam Research Corp., analysts believe Seagate Technology Holdings Plc is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seagate Technology Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.944%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings Plc pays out 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's net income of $549M. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.92x while Seagate Technology Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 37.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 12.74x versus 6.65x for Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital Corp. has a net margin of 29.46% compared to Lam Research Corp.'s net margin of 41.06%. Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02% beat Western Digital Corp.'s return on equity of 34.37%.

Lam Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $169.83, signalling downside risk potential of -12.8%. On the other hand Western Digital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $187.21 which suggests that it could fall by -0.36%. Given that Lam Research Corp. has more downside risk than Western Digital Corp., analysts believe Western Digital Corp. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital Corp. has a beta of 1.787, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.743%.

Lam Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Western Digital Corp. offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research Corp. pays 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital Corp. pays out 2.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Western Digital Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Western Digital Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lam Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.92x while Western Digital Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research Corp. is 12.74x versus 5.69x for Western Digital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.