KLAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 35.53% compared to KLA's net margin of 9.53%. KLA's return on equity of 104.91% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $785.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.63%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $126.98 which suggests that it could grow by 23.47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. KLA's net income of $1.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 75.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.18x versus 6.05x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 35.53% compared to KLA's net margin of 11.02%. KLA's return on equity of 104.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $785.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.63%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 79.35%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. KLA's net income of $1.1B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.18x versus 8.65x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 35.53% compared to KLA's net margin of 19.66%. KLA's return on equity of 104.91% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $785.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.63%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $123.35 which suggests that it could grow by 44.86%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.842%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. KLA's net income of $1.1B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 20.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.18x versus 3.08x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 35.53% compared to KLA's net margin of 56.17%. KLA's return on equity of 104.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $785.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.63%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $163.12 which suggests that it could grow by 38.98%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. KLA's net income of $1.1B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.57x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.18x versus 22.31x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.