INTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 6.29%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $137.74 which suggests that it could grow by 52.39%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 91.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.66x versus 5.74x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 26.8%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $794.97 which suggests that it could grow by 20.98%. Given that KLA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe KLA is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. KLA offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while KLA's PE ratio is 27.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.66x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 14.06%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 8.76%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $65.67 which suggests that it could grow by 49.58%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.603%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $117.4M. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $16.5M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 99.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.66x versus 11.92x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of -5.22%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $60.56 which suggests that it could grow by 44.44%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 74.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.66x versus 4.78x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.