GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 6.44%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 13.49%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.10, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $42.77 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.188%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.7B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $173M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.96x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.56x versus 1.05x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 9.6%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.10, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.58 which suggests that it could grow by 30.96%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.446%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.96x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.56x versus 1.14x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 10.24%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.10, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.89%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.96x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.56x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 6.63%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.10, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $48.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.17%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

General Mills has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.436%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.41%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.96x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 9.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.56x versus 0.62x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.