GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Campbell Soup has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 7.86%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Campbell Soup's return on equity of 14.38%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $71.16, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Campbell Soup has an analysts' consensus of $49.36 which suggests that it could grow by 18.93%. Given that Campbell Soup has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Campbell Soup is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.098, which suggesting that the stock is 90.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.005%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Campbell Soup offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Campbell Soup quarterly revenues of $2.8B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than Campbell Soup's net income of $218M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.83x while Campbell Soup's PE ratio is 22.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.81x versus 1.26x for Campbell Soup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 24.03%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $71.16, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.098, which suggesting that the stock is 90.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.83x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.81x versus 5.83x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of -2.26%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $71.16, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $69.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.4%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.098, which suggesting that the stock is 90.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.79%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.83x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 24.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.81x versus 1.42x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 12.57%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $71.16, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.098, which suggesting that the stock is 90.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.414%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.83x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.81x versus 2.29x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.