FTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories Inc. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 10.8%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Core Laboratories Inc.'s return on equity of 12.42%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $45.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand Core Laboratories Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could fall by -16.82%. Given that Core Laboratories Inc. has more downside risk than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe TechnipFMC plc is more attractive than Core Laboratories Inc..

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories Inc. has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Core Laboratories Inc. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc. pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Core Laboratories Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Core Laboratories Inc.'s net income of $14.5M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Core Laboratories Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 2.00x versus 1.54x for Core Laboratories Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 0.36%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $45.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $30.29 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.59%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 2.00x versus 1.11x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 9.6%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $45.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand Oceaneering International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.25 which suggests that it could fall by -9.99%. Given that Oceaneering International, Inc. has more downside risk than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe TechnipFMC plc is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.306%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Oceaneering International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $742.9M. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Oceaneering International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 2.00x versus 0.97x for Oceaneering International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 9.32%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $45.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $128.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.62%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Exxon Mobil Corp. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 2.00x versus 1.56x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.