FTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 9.49% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of -8.82%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $34.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 181.69%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, which suggesting that the stock is 56.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.982, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.243%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.5M. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.51x versus 0.08x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 9.49% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 16.73%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $34.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 7.52%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, which suggesting that the stock is 56.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.51x versus 4.15x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 9.49% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of -6.25%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $34.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.81%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, which suggesting that the stock is 56.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 257.676%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $141.4M. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.51x versus 0.08x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 7.86%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $34.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.69%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, which suggesting that the stock is 56.274% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.051%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $713.5M. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 15.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.51x versus 0.85x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.