FTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories Inc. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 10.8%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Core Laboratories Inc.'s return on equity of 12.42%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Core Laboratories Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.43%. Given that TechnipFMC plc has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories Inc., analysts believe TechnipFMC plc is more attractive than Core Laboratories Inc..

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories Inc. has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Core Laboratories Inc. offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc. pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Core Laboratories Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Core Laboratories Inc.'s net income of $14.5M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Core Laboratories Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 1.94x versus 1.49x for Core Laboratories Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 0.36%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.62%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.59%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 1.94x versus 1.09x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International, Inc. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 9.6%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Oceaneering International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.37%. Given that TechnipFMC plc has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, Inc., analysts believe TechnipFMC plc is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.306%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Oceaneering International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $742.9M. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is higher than Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while Oceaneering International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 1.94x versus 0.87x for Oceaneering International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 11.77% compared to TechnipFMC plc's net margin of 8.68%. TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.34% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

TechnipFMC plc has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $45.99 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that SLB Ltd. has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC plc, analysts believe SLB Ltd. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.677, which suggesting that the stock is 32.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.082%.

TechnipFMC plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. TechnipFMC plc pays 10.45% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. TechnipFMC plc's net income of $310.9M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, TechnipFMC plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.02x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC plc is 1.94x versus 1.52x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.