FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crane has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 19.21%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Crane's return on equity of 21.44%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $61.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.08%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $179.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.11%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Crane.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Crane offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Crane quarterly revenues of $557.6M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than Crane's net income of $107.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Crane's PE ratio is 29.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.34x versus 4.61x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 23.49%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Graco's return on equity of 19.79%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $61.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.08%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.03 which suggests that it could grow by 7.38%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.38%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Graco offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $528.3M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than Graco's net income of $124.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Graco's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.34x versus 6.57x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 11.73%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat IDEX's return on equity of 12.75%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $61.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.08%. On the other hand IDEX has an analysts' consensus of $211.92 which suggests that it could grow by 17.67%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than IDEX, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than IDEX.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.669%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. IDEX offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX pays out 40.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than IDEX quarterly revenues of $814.3M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than IDEX's net income of $95.5M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while IDEX's PE ratio is 28.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.34x versus 4.16x for IDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -814.55%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $61.20, signalling upside risk potential of 31.08%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.34x versus 7.70x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.