FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graco, Inc. has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Flowserve Corp.'s net margin of 25.33%. Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81% beat Graco, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.63%.

Flowserve Corp. has a consensus price target of $78.20, signalling upside risk potential of 12.71%. On the other hand Graco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.97%. Given that Flowserve Corp. has higher upside potential than Graco, Inc., analysts believe Flowserve Corp. is more attractive than Graco, Inc..

Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.295, which suggesting that the stock is 29.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.649%.

Flowserve Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Graco, Inc. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flowserve Corp. pays 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco, Inc. pays out 36.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Graco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $543.4M. Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M is higher than Graco, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M. Notably, Flowserve Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Graco, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve Corp. is 1.95x versus 6.37x for Graco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Flowserve Corp.'s net margin of 4.68%. Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81% beat Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Flowserve Corp. has a consensus price target of $78.20, signalling upside risk potential of 12.71%. On the other hand Helios Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.20 which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flowserve Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Flowserve Corp..

Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.295, which suggesting that the stock is 29.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.126%.

Flowserve Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Helios Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Flowserve Corp. pays 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays out 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $220.3M. Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M is higher than Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M. Notably, Flowserve Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Helios Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve Corp. is 1.95x versus 2.21x for Helios Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Flowserve Corp.'s net margin of 15.89%. Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81% beat Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21%.

Flowserve Corp. has a consensus price target of $78.20, signalling upside risk potential of 12.71%. On the other hand Parker-Hannifin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $924.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.23%. Given that Flowserve Corp. has higher upside potential than Parker-Hannifin Corp., analysts believe Flowserve Corp. is more attractive than Parker-Hannifin Corp..

Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.295, which suggesting that the stock is 29.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.381%.

Flowserve Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Parker-Hannifin Corp. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Flowserve Corp. pays 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays out 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M is lower than Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M. Notably, Flowserve Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve Corp. is 1.95x versus 5.69x for Parker-Hannifin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Flowserve Corp.'s net margin of 13.44%. Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18%.

Flowserve Corp. has a consensus price target of $78.20, signalling upside risk potential of 12.71%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.57 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that Flowserve Corp. has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Flowserve Corp. is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies, Inc..

Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.295, which suggesting that the stock is 29.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.595%.

Flowserve Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Flowserve Corp. pays 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M is higher than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, Flowserve Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve Corp. is 1.95x versus 3.93x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.