Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
$211.6M | $0.66 | 9.7% | 399.65% | $65.20 |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
$578.9M | $1.49 | 5.16% | 1.66% | $213.67 |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
$1.2B | $0.80 | 6.94% | 62.11% | $78.20 |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
$4.9B | $6.62 | 6.87% | -1.34% | $924.91 |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
$450.3M | $2.73 | 16.81% | 56.25% | $482.83 |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$576.3M | $2.26 | 12.77% | 15.26% | $293.57 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
$55.37 | $65.20 | $1.8B | 54.61x | $0.09 | 0.65% | 2.29x |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
$188.98 | $213.67 | $10.9B | 34.15x | $0.23 | 0.49% | 4.87x |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
$71.24 | $78.20 | $9.1B | 20.73x | $0.21 | 1.18% | 2.01x |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
$886.47 | $924.91 | $111.9B | 31.58x | $1.80 | 0.79% | 5.74x |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
$459.83 | $482.83 | $14.5B | 56.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.40x |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$283.27 | $293.57 | $9.4B | 29.23x | $0.52 | 0.7% | 4.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
32.27% | 3.118 | 25.52% | 1.25x |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
0.68% | 1.635 | 0.13% | 2.19x |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
42.47% | 2.077 | 24.36% | 1.54x |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
42.86% | 1.611 | 10.8% | 0.52x |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
26.26% | 1.714 | 9.2% | 1.07x |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
9.17% | 1.179 | 2.12% | 1.71x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
$65.4M | $27.4M | 2.49% | 3.79% | 12.44% | $18.5M |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
$251.3M | $118.4M | 16.29% | 18.13% | 20.1% | $113M |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
$405.8M | $105.2M | 12.48% | 21.81% | 8.96% | $384.7M |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
$1.9B | $1.1B | 15.79% | 27.21% | 21.01% | $693M |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
$179.9M | $102.5M | 6.32% | 8.55% | 22.51% | $71.7M |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$298.4M | $113.3M | 16.11% | 18% | 18.52% | $110.9M |
Crane Co. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 15.51%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Crane Co.'s return on equity of 18.13%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
29.69% | $0.31 | $1.4B |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
42.65% | $1.56 | $2B |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Crane Co. has an analysts' consensus of $213.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crane Co., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Crane Co..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
6 | 2 | 0 |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane Co. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Crane Co. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane Co. pays out 16.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Crane Co. quarterly revenues of $589.2M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Crane Co.'s net income of $91.4M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.61x while Crane Co.'s PE ratio is 34.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.29x versus 4.87x for Crane Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
2.29x | 54.61x | $220.3M | $10.3M |
|
CR
Crane Co.
|
4.87x | 34.15x | $589.2M | $91.4M |
Flowserve Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 19.06%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
29.69% | $0.31 | $1.4B |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
34.55% | $1.67 | $4B |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Flowserve Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.20 which suggests that it could grow by 9.77%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flowserve Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Flowserve Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
7 | 3 | 0 |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.016%.
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Flowserve Corp. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve Corp. pays out 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.61x while Flowserve Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.29x versus 2.01x for Flowserve Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
2.29x | 54.61x | $220.3M | $10.3M |
|
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
|
2.01x | 20.73x | $1.2B | $223.9M |
Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 15.89%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
29.69% | $0.31 | $1.4B |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
37.69% | $6.29 | $24.1B |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Parker-Hannifin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $924.91 which suggests that it could grow by 4.34%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Parker-Hannifin Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Parker-Hannifin Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
15 | 6 | 1 |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.657%.
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Parker-Hannifin Corp. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays out 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.61x while Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.29x versus 5.74x for Parker-Hannifin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
2.29x | 54.61x | $220.3M | $10.3M |
|
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
5.74x | 31.58x | $5.1B | $808M |
RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 13.18%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
29.69% | $0.31 | $1.4B |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
39.51% | $1.90 | $4.3B |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $482.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, Inc., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than RBC Bearings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
5 | 2 | 0 |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.778%.
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.61x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.29x versus 8.40x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
2.29x | 54.61x | $220.3M | $10.3M |
|
RBC
RBC Bearings, Inc.
|
8.40x | 56.11x | $455.3M | $60M |
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 13.44%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
29.69% | $0.31 | $1.4B |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
48.78% | $2.45 | $2.2B |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.57 which suggests that it could grow by 3.64%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
1 | 10 | 0 |
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.343%.
Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.61x while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.29x versus 4.03x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
|
2.29x | 54.61x | $220.3M | $10.3M |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
4.03x | 29.23x | $611.7M | $82.2M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.