HLIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Curtiss-Wright Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 14.36%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Curtiss-Wright Corp.'s return on equity of 18.25%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $608.17 which suggests that it could grow by 10.57%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright Corp..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright Corp. has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.769%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Curtiss-Wright Corp. offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright Corp. pays out 7.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright Corp. quarterly revenues of $869.2M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Curtiss-Wright Corp.'s net income of $124.8M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.41x while Curtiss-Wright Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 6.17x for Curtiss-Wright Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 19.06%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Flowserve Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $76.80 which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flowserve Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Flowserve Corp..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.016%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Flowserve Corp. offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve Corp. pays out 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.41x while Flowserve Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 2.02x for Flowserve Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Graham Corp.'s return on equity of 11.44%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Graham Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $69.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Graham Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Graham Corp..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham Corp. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.004%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Graham Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are larger than Graham Corp. quarterly revenues of $66M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than Graham Corp.'s net income of $3.1M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.41x while Graham Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 2.87x for Graham Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 13.18%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $479.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.51%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, Inc., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than RBC Bearings, Inc..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.778%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.41x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 8.00x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.