HLIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 19.06%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Flowserve Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.46%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flowserve Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Flowserve Corp..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.016%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Flowserve Corp. offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve Corp. pays out 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.52x while Flowserve Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 1.98x for Flowserve Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 15.89%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s return on equity of 27.21%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Parker-Hannifin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $924.91 which suggests that it could grow by 4.06%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Parker-Hannifin Corp., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Parker-Hannifin Corp..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker-Hannifin Corp. has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.657%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Parker-Hannifin Corp. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker-Hannifin Corp. pays out 24.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Parker-Hannifin Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s net income of $808M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.52x while Parker-Hannifin Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 5.75x for Parker-Hannifin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 13.18%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $482.83 which suggests that it could grow by 6.61%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, Inc., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than RBC Bearings, Inc..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.778%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.52x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 8.27x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 13.44%. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.57 which suggests that it could grow by 4.83%. Given that Helios Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Helios Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies, Inc..

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.343%.

Helios Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Helios Technologies, Inc. pays 30.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helios Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.3M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Helios Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $10.3M is lower than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, Helios Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.52x while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helios Technologies, Inc. is 2.24x versus 3.99x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.