FIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 13.42%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Broadridge Financial Solutions's return on equity of 35.04%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.84, signalling upside risk potential of 9.56%. On the other hand Broadridge Financial Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $256.27 which suggests that it could grow by 8.36%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Broadridge Financial Solutions, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Broadridge Financial Solutions.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.977%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 52.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Broadridge Financial Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions's net income of $243.1M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.74x while Broadridge Financial Solutions's PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.28x versus 4.14x for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fortinet has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 28.15%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Fortinet's return on equity of 208.09%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.84, signalling upside risk potential of 9.56%. On the other hand Fortinet has an analysts' consensus of $108.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.55%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortinet has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.517%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Fortinet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortinet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortinet quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Fortinet's net income of $433.4M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.74x while Fortinet's PE ratio is 41.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.28x versus 12.57x for Fortinet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 42.61%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.84, signalling upside risk potential of 9.56%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.99%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.74x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 46.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.28x versus 23.96x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xerox Holdings has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of -6.18%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -71.35%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $87.84, signalling upside risk potential of 9.56%. On the other hand Xerox Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.14 which suggests that it could grow by 70.14%. Given that Xerox Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Xerox Holdings is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.810, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.983%.

Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Xerox Holdings offers a yield of 16.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings pays out -10.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is higher than Xerox Holdings's net income of -$90M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.74x while Xerox Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.28x versus 0.11x for Xerox Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.