Financhill
Buy
68

FIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$75.50
Seasonality move :
4.76%
Day range:
$74.70 - $77.10
52-week range:
$66.51 - $91.98
Dividend yield:
1.96%
P/E ratio:
49.68x
P/S ratio:
4.03x
P/B ratio:
2.63x
Volume:
5M
Avg. volume:
4.5M
1-year change:
1.61%
Market cap:
$39.7B
Revenue:
$10.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.52

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
$2.5B $1.20 3.46% 208.73% $88.02
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$783M $0.32 35.57% -89.54% $67.85
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
$1B $1.57 2.57% 41.39% $102.22
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
$1.9B $2.41 5.91% 28.47% $250.26
FTNT
Fortinet
$1.5B $0.53 13.93% 37% $113.01
XRX
Xerox Holdings
$1.4B -$0.03 -3.04% -36.36% $9.14
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
$75.51 $88.02 $39.7B 49.68x $0.40 1.96% 4.03x
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$51.54 $67.85 $16.4B -- $0.00 0% 5.94x
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
$82.86 $102.22 $12.5B 25.42x $0.00 0% 3.20x
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
$236.19 $250.26 $27.7B 35.52x $0.88 1.46% 4.13x
FTNT
Fortinet
$106.72 $113.01 $82.1B 47.22x $0.00 0% 13.83x
XRX
Xerox Holdings
$5.41 $9.14 $680.5M -- $0.13 16.17% 0.11x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
44.38% 0.182 30.6% 0.45x
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
72.82% 4.450 38.82% 56.71x
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
42.09% -0.170 24.71% 1.11x
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
59.04% 0.746 12.45% 1.19x
FTNT
Fortinet
39.96% 1.515 1.37% 1.36x
XRX
Xerox Holdings
72.25% 2.783 394.73% 0.67x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
$879M $349M 2.97% 5.01% 12.24% $224M
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$602.2M $103.5M -2.1% -7.31% 22% $268.1M
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
$605.6M $159.7M 6.1% 10.67% 16.74% $180.9M
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
$575.8M $344.9M 13.69% 35.04% 19.01% $336.8M
FTNT
Fortinet
$1.3B $574.1M 123.67% 417.67% 37.55% $380M
XRX
Xerox Holdings
$426M -$4M -24.99% -71.35% -2.33% -$109M

Fidelity National Information Services vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FIS or AFRM?

    Affirm Holdings has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 9.28%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -7.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    34.72% $0.15 $27.1B
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    69.51% $0.23 $10.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About FIS or AFRM?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $88.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Affirm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $67.85 which suggests that it could grow by 31.65%. Given that Affirm Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Affirm Holdings is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    10 10 0
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    10 8 0
  • Is FIS or AFRM More Risky?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FIS or AFRM?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Affirm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Affirm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FIS or AFRM?

    Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues of $866.4M. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Affirm Holdings's net income of $80.4M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.68x while Affirm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.03x versus 5.94x for Affirm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    4.03x 49.68x $2.5B $77M
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    5.94x -- $866.4M $80.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns FIS or AKAM?

    Akamai Technologies has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 13.72%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    34.72% $0.15 $27.1B
    AKAM
    Akamai Technologies
    59.37% $0.91 $8.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About FIS or AKAM?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $88.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Akamai Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $102.22 which suggests that it could grow by 23.37%. Given that Akamai Technologies has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Akamai Technologies is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    10 10 0
    AKAM
    Akamai Technologies
    12 8 0
  • Is FIS or AKAM More Risky?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.149%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FIS or AKAM?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Akamai Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Akamai Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FIS or AKAM?

    Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues of $1B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.68x while Akamai Technologies's PE ratio is 25.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.03x versus 3.20x for Akamai Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    4.03x 49.68x $2.5B $77M
    AKAM
    Akamai Technologies
    3.20x 25.42x $1B $139.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns FIS or BR?

    Broadridge Financial Solutions has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 13.42%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Broadridge Financial Solutions's return on equity of 35.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    34.72% $0.15 $27.1B
    BR
    Broadridge Financial Solutions
    31.78% $2.05 $5.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FIS or BR?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $88.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Broadridge Financial Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $250.26 which suggests that it could grow by 5.96%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Broadridge Financial Solutions, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Broadridge Financial Solutions.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    10 10 0
    BR
    Broadridge Financial Solutions
    0 6 0
  • Is FIS or BR More Risky?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.72%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FIS or BR?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 52.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FIS or BR?

    Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Broadridge Financial Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions's net income of $243.1M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.68x while Broadridge Financial Solutions's PE ratio is 35.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.03x versus 4.13x for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    4.03x 49.68x $2.5B $77M
    BR
    Broadridge Financial Solutions
    4.13x 35.52x $1.8B $243.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns FIS or FTNT?

    Fortinet has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of 31.7%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    34.72% $0.15 $27.1B
    FTNT
    Fortinet
    81.06% $0.68 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About FIS or FTNT?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $88.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Fortinet has an analysts' consensus of $113.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.89%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Fortinet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    10 10 0
    FTNT
    Fortinet
    8 26 2
  • Is FIS or FTNT More Risky?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortinet has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.506%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FIS or FTNT?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Fortinet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortinet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FIS or FTNT?

    Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortinet quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is lower than Fortinet's net income of $526.2M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.68x while Fortinet's PE ratio is 47.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.03x versus 13.83x for Fortinet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    4.03x 49.68x $2.5B $77M
    FTNT
    Fortinet
    13.83x 47.22x $1.7B $526.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns FIS or XRX?

    Xerox Holdings has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Fidelity National Information Services's net margin of -6.18%. Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 5.01% beat Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -71.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    34.72% $0.15 $27.1B
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings
    29.24% -$0.75 $4.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About FIS or XRX?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $88.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Xerox Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.14 which suggests that it could grow by 68.89%. Given that Xerox Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Xerox Holdings is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    10 10 0
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings
    1 2 1
  • Is FIS or XRX More Risky?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.750, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.95%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FIS or XRX?

    Fidelity National Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Xerox Holdings offers a yield of 16.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity National Information Services pays 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings pays out -10.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FIS or XRX?

    Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $77M is higher than Xerox Holdings's net income of -$90M. Notably, Fidelity National Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.68x while Xerox Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity National Information Services is 4.03x versus 0.11x for Xerox Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services
    4.03x 49.68x $2.5B $77M
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings
    0.11x -- $1.5B -$90M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Broadcom (Nasdaq: AVGO) stock has gone up more than 64%…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 22.52% over the past day.

Buy
52
SRPT alert for May 8

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is down 21.54% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 23.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock