EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of -24.72% compared to EQT's net margin of 9.17%. EQT's return on equity of 1.97% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.33%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $47.06, signalling upside risk potential of 5.56%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $175.06 which suggests that it could grow by 22.16%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.462%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. EQT pays 13.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 53.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.9B. EQT's net income of -$300.8M is lower than Chevron's net income of $4.5B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.07x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.42x versus 1.36x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -24.72% compared to EQT's net margin of 18.39%. EQT's return on equity of 1.97% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $47.06, signalling upside risk potential of 5.56%. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.61%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. EQT pays 13.16% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $271.6M. EQT's net income of -$300.8M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.07x while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.42x versus 1.67x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of -24.72% compared to EQT's net margin of --. EQT's return on equity of 1.97% beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of --.

EQT has a consensus price target of $47.06, signalling upside risk potential of 5.56%. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EQT has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe EQT is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

EQT has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.950, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.014%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT pays 13.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EQT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of --. EQT's net income of -$300.8M is lower than Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.07x while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.42x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -24.72% compared to EQT's net margin of 9.81%. EQT's return on equity of 1.97% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $47.06, signalling upside risk potential of 5.56%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.31%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. EQT pays 13.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. EQT's net income of -$300.8M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.07x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.42x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.