EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNX Resources has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of -34.47%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat CNX Resources's return on equity of -2.13%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 5.04%. On the other hand CNX Resources has an analysts' consensus of $31.15 which suggests that it could fall by -1.04%. Given that EQT has higher upside potential than CNX Resources, analysts believe EQT is more attractive than CNX Resources.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNX Resources has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.892%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. CNX Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. CNX Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than CNX Resources quarterly revenues of $419.6M. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than CNX Resources's net income of -$144.6M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.58x while CNX Resources's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.29x versus 3.48x for CNX Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of 14.51%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 21.75%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 5.04%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $48.98 which suggests that it could grow by 30.97%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.067%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $639M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.58x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.29x versus 1.49x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of -19.96%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -6%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 5.04%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.08 which suggests that it could grow by 11.46%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$399M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.58x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.29x versus 4.21x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 23.14% compared to EQT's net margin of -1.88%. EQT's return on equity of 1.28% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 5.04%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 20.38%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. EQT's net income of $418.4M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.58x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.29x versus 1.77x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.