EFX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Equifax's net margin of 17.76%. Equifax's return on equity of 12.43% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Equifax has a consensus price target of $283.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $209.54 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that Equifax has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Equifax is more attractive than Cintas.

Equifax has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.26%.

Equifax has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Equifax pays 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equifax quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Equifax's net income of $133.1M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Equifax's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.62x while Cintas's PE ratio is 49.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equifax is 5.72x versus 8.65x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Equifax's net margin of 5.08%. Equifax's return on equity of 12.43% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23%.

Equifax has a consensus price target of $283.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $542.32 which suggests that it could grow by 11.25%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Equifax, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Equifax.

Equifax has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.892%.

Equifax has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. Equifax pays 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equifax quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Equifax's net income of $133.1M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M. Notably, Equifax's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.62x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 19.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equifax is 5.72x versus 1.77x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Equifax's net margin of -34.03%. Equifax's return on equity of 12.43% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

Equifax has a consensus price target of $283.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 75.12%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Equifax, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Equifax.

Equifax has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.43%.

Equifax has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 10.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Equifax pays 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equifax quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Equifax's net income of $133.1M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Equifax's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.62x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equifax is 5.72x versus 0.33x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Equifax's net margin of 28.59%. Equifax's return on equity of 12.43% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 329.21%.

Equifax has a consensus price target of $283.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of $294.02 which suggests that it could fall by -0.73%. Given that Equifax has higher upside potential than Verisk Analytics, analysts believe Equifax is more attractive than Verisk Analytics.

Equifax has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.604%.

Equifax has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equifax pays 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 23.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equifax quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $735.6M. Equifax's net income of $133.1M is lower than Verisk Analytics's net income of $210.3M. Notably, Equifax's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.62x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 44.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equifax is 5.72x versus 14.68x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.