COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 34.86%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.04 which suggests that it could grow by 24.54%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 2.75x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -0.24%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $160.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.64%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 13.76%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.35 which suggests that it could grow by 11.18%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.337%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 1.57x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $129.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.33%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.