Financhill
Sell
47

COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$93.26
Seasonality move :
0.04%
Day range:
$92.29 - $95.08
52-week range:
$79.88 - $122.17
Dividend yield:
3.31%
P/E ratio:
11.97x
P/S ratio:
1.98x
P/B ratio:
1.82x
Volume:
8.3M
Avg. volume:
8.9M
1-year change:
-22.55%
Market cap:
$118.9B
Revenue:
$54.7B
EPS (TTM):
$7.87

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
COP
ConocoPhillips
$15.9B $2.05 7.89% -29.11% $116.86
DVN
Devon Energy
$4.4B $1.22 4.56% -33.73% $42.98
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$3.8B $4.20 35.58% -37.3% $182.04
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$30.1B -$0.54 -15.26% -23.35% $160.18
OXY
Occidental Petroleum
$6.9B $0.76 -9.16% -54.89% $49.35
PSX
Phillips 66
$32.1B -$0.72 -13.13% -30.97% $129.75
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
COP
ConocoPhillips
$94.17 $116.86 $118.9B 11.97x $0.78 3.31% 1.98x
DVN
Devon Energy
$34.29 $42.98 $22B 7.81x $0.24 3.65% 1.30x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$146.17 $182.04 $42.7B 8.94x $1.00 3.52% 2.75x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$162.84 $160.18 $50B 22.90x $0.91 2.13% 0.39x
OXY
Occidental Petroleum
$44.39 $49.35 $43.7B 18.04x $0.24 2.03% 1.57x
PSX
Phillips 66
$125.57 $129.75 $51.2B 28.60x $1.15 3.66% 0.38x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
COP
ConocoPhillips
26.72% -0.282 17.94% 1.02x
DVN
Devon Energy
37.91% -0.062 36.52% 0.90x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
26.55% 0.334 28.27% 0.72x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
65.34% 0.855 59.8% 0.70x
OXY
Occidental Petroleum
41.66% -0.165 44.92% 0.71x
PSX
Phillips 66
40.81% 1.209 36.58% 0.79x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
COP
ConocoPhillips
$5.1B $4.2B 12.52% 17.1% 28.85% $2.7B
DVN
Devon Energy
$1.2B $1.1B 12.92% 20.2% 17.36% $1B
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.8B $1.7B 9.23% 12.66% 47.98% $663M
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$1.4B $354M 4.44% 9.28% 2.28% -$727M
OXY
Occidental Petroleum
$2.5B $1.5B 5.51% 9.25% 24.25% $240M
PSX
Phillips 66
$2B -$395M 3.76% 6.28% 2.9% -$236M

ConocoPhillips vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns COP or DVN?

    Devon Energy has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 11.1%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    26.78% $0.77 $23.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or DVN?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $42.98 which suggests that it could grow by 25.35%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    11 9 0
  • Is COP or DVN More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.298%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or DVN?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or DVN?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 1.30x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    1.30x 7.81x $4.5B $494M
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 34.86%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.04 which suggests that it could grow by 24.54%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
  • Is COP or FANG More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 2.75x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.75x 8.94x $4B $1.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or MPC?

    Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -0.24%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    4.33% -$0.24 $54B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or MPC?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $160.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.64%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    6 7 0
  • Is COP or MPC More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or MPC?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or MPC?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    0.39x 22.90x $31.5B -$74M
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or OXY?

    Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 13.76%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
    OXY
    Occidental Petroleum
    36.09% $0.77 $59.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or OXY?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.35 which suggests that it could grow by 11.18%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
    OXY
    Occidental Petroleum
    3 17 1
  • Is COP or OXY More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.337%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or OXY?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or OXY?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 1.57x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
    OXY
    Occidental Petroleum
    1.57x 18.04x $6.8B $936M
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or PSX?

    Phillips 66 has a net margin of 17.25% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    30.74% $2.23 $89B
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or PSX?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $116.86, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $129.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.33%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 7 0
  • Is COP or PSX More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or PSX?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or PSX?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.98x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.98x 11.97x $16.5B $2.8B
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.38x 28.60x $30.4B $487M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?

Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…

Which Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
Which Stocks Are Recession-Proof?

Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…

Is Gartner a Safe Stock to Own?
Is Gartner a Safe Stock to Own?

Gartner (NYSE:IT) is among the world’s largest consulting, research and…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 44x

Alerts

Buy
57
RGC alert for May 14

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 12.12% over the past day.

Buy
54
HALO alert for May 14

Halozyme Therapeutics [HALO] is down 4.78% over the past day.

Buy
91
COIN alert for May 14

Coinbase Global [COIN] is up 1.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock