COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy Corp. has a net margin of 11.49% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 16.3%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 14.21% beat Devon Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 18.58%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $112.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Devon Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.27 which suggests that it could grow by 26.3%. Given that Devon Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Devon Energy Corp. is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.426%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Devon Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy Corp. pays out 31.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Devon Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $1.7B is higher than Devon Energy Corp.'s net income of $693M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Devon Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 1.36x for Devon Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 11.49% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 5.6%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 14.21% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $112.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $201.22 which suggests that it could grow by 19.55%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $15B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $1.7B is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 11.49% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 0.48%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 14.21% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $112.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $149.30 which suggests that it could grow by 15.84%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.693%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $15B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $1.7B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 35.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.40x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 11.49% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 3.3%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 14.21% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $112.37, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.442%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $15B, which are smaller than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.2B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $1.7B is higher than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.41x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.