CL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 15%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $98.76, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $100.82 which suggests that it could grow by 8.48%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 39.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.72x versus 3.78x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 11.72%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $98.76, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.94 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.407%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.72x versus 2.22x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 19.06%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $98.76, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.74%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.72x versus 4.71x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 3.36%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $98.76, signalling upside risk potential of 9.15%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.38 which suggests that it could grow by 43.4%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.72x versus 0.63x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.