CL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Clorox Co. has a net margin of -0.1% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net margin of 9.62%. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 287.39% beat The Clorox Co.'s return on equity of 398.55%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a consensus price target of $95.32, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand The Clorox Co. has an analysts' consensus of $122.06 which suggests that it could fall by -3.08%. Given that The Clorox Co. has more downside risk than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive Co. is more attractive than The Clorox Co..

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Clorox Co. has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.538%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. The Clorox Co. offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays 78.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Clorox Co. pays out 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than The Clorox Co. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of -$5M is lower than The Clorox Co.'s net income of $161M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.88x while The Clorox Co.'s PE ratio is 20.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive Co. is 3.85x versus 2.30x for The Clorox Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark Corp. has a net margin of -0.1% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net margin of 9.58%. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 287.39% beat Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s return on equity of 127.51%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a consensus price target of $95.32, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $118.71 which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Kimberly-Clark Corp. has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe Kimberly-Clark Corp. is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive Co..

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark Corp. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.877%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Kimberly-Clark Corp. offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays 78.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark Corp. pays out 83.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of -$5M is lower than Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s net income of $391M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.88x while Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive Co. is 3.85x versus 2.12x for Kimberly-Clark Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of -0.1% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net margin of 8.71%. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 287.39% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.5%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a consensus price target of $95.32, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $170.24 which suggests that it could grow by 2.59%. Given that PepsiCo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe PepsiCo, Inc. is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive Co..

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.625%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays 78.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.3B. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of -$5M is lower than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.88x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive Co. is 3.85x versus 2.43x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a net margin of -0.1% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net margin of 19.5%. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 287.39% beat Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 31.41%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a consensus price target of $95.32, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble Co. has an analysts' consensus of $167.45 which suggests that it could grow by 4.61%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive Co..

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.381, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.916%.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Procter & Gamble Co. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays 78.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble Co. pays out 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues of $22.2B. Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of -$5M is lower than Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.3B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.88x while Procter & Gamble Co.'s PE ratio is 23.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive Co. is 3.85x versus 4.58x for Procter & Gamble Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.