CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 12.55%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $157.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.2%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than American International Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.619%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.02x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.03x versus 1.66x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.68%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $157.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.02x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.03x versus 0.86x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 0.58%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $157.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.46%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.011%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.02x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.03x versus 0.98x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 17.33%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $157.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $269.30 which suggests that it could grow by 2.87%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.388%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.02x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.03x versus 1.30x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.