CF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $89.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 292.71%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.19x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 5.35%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $89.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.24 which suggests that it could grow by 21.45%. Given that CF Industries Holdings has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.19x versus 1.07x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Partners LP has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 13.11%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 20.51%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $89.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -86.81%. Given that CF Industries Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.414%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 9.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Partners LP's is not.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $139.6M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than CVR Partners LP's net income of $18.3M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.19x versus 1.45x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 21.52% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $89.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.75%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.893% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $328M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.19x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.