Financhill
Buy
73

CAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$148.97
Seasonality move :
1.22%
Day range:
$151.53 - $153.74
52-week range:
$93.17 - $153.74
Dividend yield:
1.32%
P/E ratio:
23.94x
P/S ratio:
0.17x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
2.8M
1-year change:
53.91%
Market cap:
$36.6B
Revenue:
$226.8B
EPS (TTM):
$6.41

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CAH
Cardinal Health
$55.3B $2.15 1.46% 104.05% $154.74
BIO
Bio-Rad Laboratories
$573.2M $1.78 -3.73% -86.75% $318.67
BSX
Boston Scientific
$4.6B $0.67 18.78% 229.2% $116.12
COR
Cencora
$75.8B $4.10 7.92% 60.33% $305.82
MASI
Masimo
$367.8M $1.21 -25.72% 321.55% $183.32
MCK
McKesson
$94.2B $9.83 19.22% 19.81% $709.65
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CAH
Cardinal Health
$153.48 $154.74 $36.6B 23.94x $0.51 1.32% 0.17x
BIO
Bio-Rad Laboratories
$232.55 $318.67 $6.3B -- $0.00 0% 2.57x
BSX
Boston Scientific
$104.80 $116.12 $155B 76.50x $0.00 0% 8.89x
COR
Cencora
$304.58 $305.82 $59B 43.33x $0.55 0.7% 0.20x
MASI
Masimo
$150.11 $183.32 $8.1B 116.80x $0.00 0% 4.13x
MCK
McKesson
$722.37 $709.65 $90.5B 33.08x $0.71 0.38% 0.27x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CAH
Cardinal Health
162.31% 0.200 22.64% 0.44x
BIO
Bio-Rad Laboratories
15.25% 1.030 17.86% 4.12x
BSX
Boston Scientific
33.49% 1.029 7.48% 0.68x
COR
Cencora
97.3% 0.081 18.65% 0.51x
MASI
Masimo
40.75% 1.411 7.21% 0.87x
MCK
McKesson
162.58% 0.870 11.1% 0.46x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CAH
Cardinal Health
$2.1B $656M 46.27% -- 1.35% $2.8B
BIO
Bio-Rad Laboratories
$306M $23.7M -25.43% -29.59% 16.3% $95.5M
BSX
Boston Scientific
$3.2B $937M 6.35% 9.57% 19.02% $277M
COR
Cencora
$2.6B $807.5M 21.96% 155.22% 0.84% -$2.8B
MASI
Masimo
$234M $80.7M -24.62% -39.91% 20.75% $27M
MCK
McKesson
$3.3B $1.3B 67.6% -- 1.36% -$2.6B

Cardinal Health vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CAH or BIO?

    Bio-Rad Laboratories has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 10.93%. Cardinal Health's return on equity of -- beat Bio-Rad Laboratories's return on equity of -29.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    3.87% $2.10 $5.8B
    BIO
    Bio-Rad Laboratories
    52.27% $2.29 $7.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAH or BIO?

    Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $154.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.82%. On the other hand Bio-Rad Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $318.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.03%. Given that Bio-Rad Laboratories has higher upside potential than Cardinal Health, analysts believe Bio-Rad Laboratories is more attractive than Cardinal Health.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    9 5 0
    BIO
    Bio-Rad Laboratories
    2 2 0
  • Is CAH or BIO More Risky?

    Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bio-Rad Laboratories has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.087999999999999%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAH or BIO?

    Cardinal Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Bio-Rad Laboratories offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Health pays 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Bio-Rad Laboratories pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Health's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAH or BIO?

    Cardinal Health quarterly revenues are $54.9B, which are larger than Bio-Rad Laboratories quarterly revenues of $585.4M. Cardinal Health's net income of $506M is higher than Bio-Rad Laboratories's net income of $64M. Notably, Cardinal Health's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.94x while Bio-Rad Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Health is 0.17x versus 2.57x for Bio-Rad Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    0.17x 23.94x $54.9B $506M
    BIO
    Bio-Rad Laboratories
    2.57x -- $585.4M $64M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAH or BSX?

    Boston Scientific has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 14.45%. Cardinal Health's return on equity of -- beat Boston Scientific's return on equity of 9.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    3.87% $2.10 $5.8B
    BSX
    Boston Scientific
    68.84% $0.45 $33.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAH or BSX?

    Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $154.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.82%. On the other hand Boston Scientific has an analysts' consensus of $116.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.8%. Given that Boston Scientific has higher upside potential than Cardinal Health, analysts believe Boston Scientific is more attractive than Cardinal Health.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    9 5 0
    BSX
    Boston Scientific
    23 4 0
  • Is CAH or BSX More Risky?

    Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Scientific has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.536%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAH or BSX?

    Cardinal Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Boston Scientific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Health pays 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Scientific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Health's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAH or BSX?

    Cardinal Health quarterly revenues are $54.9B, which are larger than Boston Scientific quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Cardinal Health's net income of $506M is lower than Boston Scientific's net income of $674M. Notably, Cardinal Health's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.94x while Boston Scientific's PE ratio is 76.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Health is 0.17x versus 8.89x for Boston Scientific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    0.17x 23.94x $54.9B $506M
    BSX
    Boston Scientific
    8.89x 76.50x $4.7B $674M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAH or COR?

    Cencora has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 0.6%. Cardinal Health's return on equity of -- beat Cencora's return on equity of 155.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    3.87% $2.10 $5.8B
    COR
    Cencora
    3.14% $2.50 $8.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAH or COR?

    Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $154.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.82%. On the other hand Cencora has an analysts' consensus of $305.82 which suggests that it could grow by 0.41%. Given that Cardinal Health has higher upside potential than Cencora, analysts believe Cardinal Health is more attractive than Cencora.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    9 5 0
    COR
    Cencora
    9 6 0
  • Is CAH or COR More Risky?

    Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cencora has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.596%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAH or COR?

    Cardinal Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cencora offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cardinal Health pays 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Cencora pays out 27.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAH or COR?

    Cardinal Health quarterly revenues are $54.9B, which are smaller than Cencora quarterly revenues of $81.5B. Cardinal Health's net income of $506M is higher than Cencora's net income of $488.6M. Notably, Cardinal Health's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.94x while Cencora's PE ratio is 43.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Health is 0.17x versus 0.20x for Cencora. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    0.17x 23.94x $54.9B $506M
    COR
    Cencora
    0.20x 43.33x $81.5B $488.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAH or MASI?

    Masimo has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of -45.89%. Cardinal Health's return on equity of -- beat Masimo's return on equity of -39.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    3.87% $2.10 $5.8B
    MASI
    Masimo
    62.9% -$3.17 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAH or MASI?

    Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $154.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.82%. On the other hand Masimo has an analysts' consensus of $183.32 which suggests that it could grow by 22.13%. Given that Masimo has higher upside potential than Cardinal Health, analysts believe Masimo is more attractive than Cardinal Health.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    9 5 0
    MASI
    Masimo
    4 3 0
  • Is CAH or MASI More Risky?

    Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masimo has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.855%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAH or MASI?

    Cardinal Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Masimo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Health pays 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Masimo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Health's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAH or MASI?

    Cardinal Health quarterly revenues are $54.9B, which are larger than Masimo quarterly revenues of $372M. Cardinal Health's net income of $506M is higher than Masimo's net income of -$170.7M. Notably, Cardinal Health's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.94x while Masimo's PE ratio is 116.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Health is 0.17x versus 4.13x for Masimo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    0.17x 23.94x $54.9B $506M
    MASI
    Masimo
    4.13x 116.80x $372M -$170.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CAH or MCK?

    McKesson has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 0.92%. Cardinal Health's return on equity of -- beat McKesson's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    3.87% $2.10 $5.8B
    MCK
    McKesson
    3.45% $6.95 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CAH or MCK?

    Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $154.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.82%. On the other hand McKesson has an analysts' consensus of $709.65 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Cardinal Health has higher upside potential than McKesson, analysts believe Cardinal Health is more attractive than McKesson.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    9 5 0
    MCK
    McKesson
    10 3 0
  • Is CAH or MCK More Risky?

    Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McKesson has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.469%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAH or MCK?

    Cardinal Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. McKesson offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Cardinal Health pays 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. McKesson pays out 10.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CAH or MCK?

    Cardinal Health quarterly revenues are $54.9B, which are smaller than McKesson quarterly revenues of $95.3B. Cardinal Health's net income of $506M is lower than McKesson's net income of $879M. Notably, Cardinal Health's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.94x while McKesson's PE ratio is 33.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Health is 0.17x versus 0.27x for McKesson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CAH
    Cardinal Health
    0.17x 23.94x $54.9B $506M
    MCK
    McKesson
    0.27x 33.08x $95.3B $879M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?

BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 18.42% over the past day.

Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8

Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 7.02% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.15% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock