BUDZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cencora, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to WEED, Inc.'s net margin of 0.66%. WEED, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cencora, Inc.'s return on equity of 107.99%.

WEED, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cencora, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $403.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that Cencora, Inc. has higher upside potential than WEED, Inc., analysts believe Cencora, Inc. is more attractive than WEED, Inc..

WEED, Inc. has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cencora, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.374%.

WEED, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cencora, Inc. offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. WEED, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cencora, Inc. pays out 27.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Cencora, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WEED, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cencora, Inc. quarterly revenues of $85.9B. WEED, Inc.'s net income of -$73.9K is lower than Cencora, Inc.'s net income of $566.1M. Notably, WEED, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 180.00x while Cencora, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WEED, Inc. is -- versus 0.22x for Cencora, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McKesson Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to WEED, Inc.'s net margin of 1.18%. WEED, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat McKesson Corp.'s return on equity of --.

WEED, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McKesson Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $980.40 which suggests that it could grow by 3.48%. Given that McKesson Corp. has higher upside potential than WEED, Inc., analysts believe McKesson Corp. is more attractive than WEED, Inc..

WEED, Inc. has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McKesson Corp. has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.521%.

WEED, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McKesson Corp. offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. WEED, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McKesson Corp. pays out 10.69% of its earnings as a dividend. McKesson Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WEED, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McKesson Corp. quarterly revenues of $106.2B. WEED, Inc.'s net income of -$73.9K is lower than McKesson Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, WEED, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 180.00x while McKesson Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WEED, Inc. is -- versus 0.30x for McKesson Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to WEED, Inc.'s net margin of -184.62%. WEED, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Pineapple, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

WEED, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pineapple, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WEED, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pineapple, Inc., analysts believe WEED, Inc. is more attractive than Pineapple, Inc..

WEED, Inc. has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple, Inc. has a beta of 41.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4009.732%.

WEED, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pineapple, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WEED, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WEED, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pineapple, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3K. WEED, Inc.'s net income of -$73.9K is lower than Pineapple, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4K. Notably, WEED, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 180.00x while Pineapple, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WEED, Inc. is -- versus 50.83x for Pineapple, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mach7 Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to WEED, Inc.'s net margin of --. WEED, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Mach7 Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.84%.

WEED, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mach7 Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WEED, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mach7 Technologies Ltd., analysts believe WEED, Inc. is more attractive than Mach7 Technologies Ltd..

WEED, Inc. has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mach7 Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.028, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.169%.

WEED, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mach7 Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WEED, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach7 Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WEED, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Mach7 Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WEED, Inc.'s net income of -$73.9K is higher than Mach7 Technologies Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WEED, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 180.00x while Mach7 Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WEED, Inc. is -- versus 3.57x for Mach7 Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.