CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 8.52%. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.13% beat General Mills, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.02%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.87, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand General Mills, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.47 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that General Mills, Inc. has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, Inc., analysts believe General Mills, Inc. is more attractive than Conagra Brands, Inc..

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills, Inc. has a beta of -0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.398%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.27%. General Mills, Inc. offers a yield of 5.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Conagra Brands, Inc. pays 58.28% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills, Inc. pays out 58.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Mills, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$663.6M is lower than General Mills, Inc.'s net income of $414.3M. Notably, Conagra Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while General Mills, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands, Inc. is 0.72x versus 1.30x for General Mills, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hershey Co. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 8.69%. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.13% beat The Hershey Co.'s return on equity of 29.97%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.87, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand The Hershey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $194.35 which suggests that it could grow by 2.79%. Given that Conagra Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Hershey Co., analysts believe Conagra Brands, Inc. is more attractive than The Hershey Co..

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hershey Co. has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.549%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.27%. The Hershey Co. offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Conagra Brands, Inc. pays 58.28% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey Co. pays out 50.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than The Hershey Co. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$663.6M is lower than The Hershey Co.'s net income of $276.3M. Notably, Conagra Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while The Hershey Co.'s PE ratio is 28.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands, Inc. is 0.72x versus 3.35x for The Hershey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 3.84%. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.13% beat Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.87, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.64 which suggests that it could grow by 32.07%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Conagra Brands, Inc..

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.787%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.27%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Conagra Brands, Inc. pays 58.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$663.6M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, Conagra Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands, Inc. is 0.72x versus 0.90x for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The J. M. Smucker Co. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 10.36%. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.13% beat The J. M. Smucker Co.'s return on equity of -18.31%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.87, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand The J. M. Smucker Co. has an analysts' consensus of $115.73 which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that The J. M. Smucker Co. has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, Inc., analysts believe The J. M. Smucker Co. is more attractive than Conagra Brands, Inc..

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The J. M. Smucker Co. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.008%.

Conagra Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.27%. The J. M. Smucker Co. offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Conagra Brands, Inc. pays 58.28% of its earnings as a dividend. The J. M. Smucker Co. pays out 37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than The J. M. Smucker Co. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$663.6M is lower than The J. M. Smucker Co.'s net income of $241.3M. Notably, Conagra Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while The J. M. Smucker Co.'s PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands, Inc. is 0.72x versus 1.22x for The J. M. Smucker Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.