CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 12.92%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $27.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.21%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.81 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, which suggesting that the stock is 82.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.636%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.69x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 32.41%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $27.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.21%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.63 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, which suggesting that the stock is 82.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.43x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -2.26%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $27.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.21%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.72 which suggests that it could grow by 23.53%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, which suggesting that the stock is 82.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.375%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 21.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.23x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -30.3%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $27.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.21%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.56 which suggests that it could grow by 2.78%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than JM Smucker.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, which suggesting that the stock is 82.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.851%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.07x versus 1.76x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.