BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 0.5%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat American Axle & Mfg Holdings's return on equity of 3.59%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $35.76, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand American Axle & Mfg Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.13 which suggests that it could grow by 23.58%. Given that American Axle & Mfg Holdings has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe American Axle & Mfg Holdings is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a beta of 1.714, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.352%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. American Axle & Mfg Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. American Axle & Mfg Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than American Axle & Mfg Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than American Axle & Mfg Holdings's net income of $7.1M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while American Axle & Mfg Holdings's PE ratio is 24.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 0.08x for American Axle & Mfg Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.54%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Lear's return on equity of 10.36%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $35.76, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $105.43 which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Lear.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.537%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Lear offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.7B. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Lear's net income of $88.1M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while Lear's PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 0.21x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.65%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Modine Manufacturing's return on equity of 19.94%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $35.76, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $139.69 which suggests that it could grow by 54.81%. Given that Modine Manufacturing has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Modine Manufacturing is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.3%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Modine Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $616.8M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Modine Manufacturing's net income of $41M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while Modine Manufacturing's PE ratio is 30.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 1.92x for Modine Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.96%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $35.76, signalling upside risk potential of 23.3%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $92.31 which suggests that it could grow by 14.61%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.396%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.46x versus 0.58x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.