BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -6.75% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.69% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $68.85, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.63 which suggests that it could grow by 22.46%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe BorgWarner, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.374, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.403%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of -$241M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.70x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 25.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 0.81x versus 0.40x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing Co. has a net margin of -6.75% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of -5.81%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.69% beat Modine Manufacturing Co.'s return on equity of 10%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $68.85, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $251.14 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has higher upside potential than Modine Manufacturing Co., analysts believe BorgWarner, Inc. is more attractive than Modine Manufacturing Co..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing Co. has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.731%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Modine Manufacturing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing Co. quarterly revenues of $805M. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of -$241M is lower than Modine Manufacturing Co.'s net income of -$46.8M. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.70x while Modine Manufacturing Co.'s PE ratio is 117.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 0.81x versus 3.96x for Modine Manufacturing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -6.75% compared to BorgWarner, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.69% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a consensus price target of $68.85, signalling upside risk potential of 27.21%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $420.90 which suggests that it could grow by 7.26%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe BorgWarner, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.992% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.894, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.438%.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner, Inc. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of -$241M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, BorgWarner, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.70x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 364.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner, Inc. is 0.81x versus 14.59x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.