BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone, Inc. has a net margin of 14.26% compared to Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 43.77%. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.14% beat Blackstone, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.16%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.54%. On the other hand Blackstone, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $151.44 which suggests that it could grow by 34.34%. Given that Blackstone, Inc. has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, Inc., analysts believe Blackstone, Inc. is more attractive than Franklin Resources, Inc..

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone, Inc. has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.854%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Blackstone, Inc. offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.49 per share. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone, Inc. pays out 121.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Blackstone, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $330.6M is lower than Blackstone, Inc.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Franklin Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Blackstone, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources, Inc. is 1.41x versus 6.30x for Blackstone, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco Ltd. has a net margin of 14.26% compared to Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -57.49%. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.14% beat Invesco Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.18%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.54%. On the other hand Invesco Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $29.41 which suggests that it could grow by 29.16%. Given that Invesco Ltd. has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, Inc., analysts believe Invesco Ltd. is more attractive than Franklin Resources, Inc..

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ltd. has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.476%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Invesco Ltd. offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd. pays out 69.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Invesco Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $330.6M is higher than Invesco Ltd.'s net income of -$995.9M. Notably, Franklin Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Invesco Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources, Inc. is 1.41x versus 1.59x for Invesco Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard, Inc. has a net margin of 14.26% compared to Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 5.6%. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.14% beat Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.41%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.54%. On the other hand Lazard, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.44 which suggests that it could grow by 34.61%. Given that Lazard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, Inc., analysts believe Lazard, Inc. is more attractive than Franklin Resources, Inc..

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.641%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Lazard, Inc. offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc. pays out 84.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues of $938.3M. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $330.6M is higher than Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $52.6M. Notably, Franklin Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Lazard, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources, Inc. is 1.41x versus 1.36x for Lazard, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.26% compared to Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 23.24%. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.14% beat T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.54%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $95.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Franklin Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Resources, Inc. is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc..

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.699%.

Franklin Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. offers a yield of 5.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. pays out 54.95% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $330.6M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s net income of $449.5M. Notably, Franklin Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources, Inc. is 1.41x versus 2.68x for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.