AES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eversource Energy has a net margin of 15.26% compared to The AES's net margin of -3.85%. The AES's return on equity of 15.92% beat Eversource Energy's return on equity of -3.66%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $18.56, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand Eversource Energy has an analysts' consensus of $70.96 which suggests that it could grow by 24.6%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Eversource Energy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Eversource Energy.

The AES has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.335% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eversource Energy has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.663%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Eversource Energy offers a yield of 5.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. The AES pays 178.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Eversource Energy pays out -209.51% of its earnings as a dividend.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Eversource Energy quarterly revenues of $3.1B. The AES's net income of $502M is higher than Eversource Energy's net income of -$118.1M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while Eversource Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.75x versus 1.73x for Eversource Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FirstEnergy has a net margin of 15.26% compared to The AES's net margin of 11.24%. The AES's return on equity of 15.92% beat FirstEnergy's return on equity of 7.09%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $18.56, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand FirstEnergy has an analysts' consensus of $47.06 which suggests that it could grow by 18.28%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than FirstEnergy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than FirstEnergy.

The AES has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.335% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstEnergy has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.817%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. FirstEnergy offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. The AES pays 178.31% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstEnergy pays out 82.21% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstEnergy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The AES's is not.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than FirstEnergy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. The AES's net income of $502M is higher than FirstEnergy's net income of $419M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while FirstEnergy's PE ratio is 25.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.75x versus 1.70x for FirstEnergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of 15.26% compared to The AES's net margin of -10.62%. The AES's return on equity of 15.92% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 30.38%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $18.56, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $98.64 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than NRG Energy.

The AES has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.335% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.152%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. The AES pays 178.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out -188.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $7.2B. The AES's net income of $502M is higher than NRG Energy's net income of -$767M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 23.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.75x versus 0.69x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern has a net margin of 15.26% compared to The AES's net margin of 21.1%. The AES's return on equity of 15.92% beat Southern's return on equity of 13.18%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $18.56, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand Southern has an analysts' consensus of $91.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Southern, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Southern.

The AES has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.335% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.333%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Southern offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. The AES pays 178.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern pays out 76.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The AES's is not.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Southern quarterly revenues of $7.3B. The AES's net income of $502M is lower than Southern's net income of $1.5B. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while Southern's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.75x versus 3.45x for Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.